Table 1.
Formula | Equation | Sample Size | Age (Years) | Gender (F:M) | Main Limitation(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Banerjee (1955) [16] | 15 | 18-44 | 0% | Small sample size. Only relevant to Indian population. Inaccurate in SE Asian population [23]. | |
Boyd (1935) | 197 | Unclear* | Unclear* | BSA overestimated if: infant, short, obese. BSA underestimated if: tall, thin [14, 24, 25]. Study demographics unclear. | |
Du Bois (1916) | 9 | Not stated | Not stated | BSA underestimated if: infant/child, obese [8, 14, 26, 27]. Significant patient heterogeneity. Study demographics unclear. Nutritional status of study sample is unrepresentative. | |
Gehan (1970) | 401 | Infants -Adults | Not stated | BSA overestimated if: short, obese. BSA underestimated if: tall, thin, increasing body size [14, 24, 26]. Study demographics unclear. Inaccurate in SE Asian population [23]. | |
Haycock (1978) [7] | 81 | ELBW infants -adults | Not accessible | BSA overestimated if: infant, short, obese. BSA underestimated if: tall, thin, increasing body size [24, 27, 28]. Inaccurate in SE Asian population [23]. | |
Jones (1994) [29] | 28 | 3.1-10.5 | 46% | Small sample size. Only 4 males included. Narrow age range. | |
Meban (1983) [30] | 79 | 11-42 weeks gestation | Not stated | Only pathological human fetuses studied. | |
Mosteller (1987) [31] | 0 | NA | NA | BSA overestimated if: short, obese [26]. BSA underestimated if: infant, tall, thin, low body size [14, 24, 32]. Less accurate simplification of the Gehan equation. | |
Shuter (2000) [33] | 42 | Not stated | Not stated | Small sample size. Patient demographics unavailable. | |
Yu (2003) [28] | 3951 | 20-91 | 54% | No subjects under 20 years of age. Formula only validated in Chinese individuals. Whole body scanning method does not take into account overlapping and shading body parts [23]. |
Chapter of book unavailable to determine age range and gender.
BSA= body surface area; ELBW = extremely low birth weight; SE = South East.