Table 3.

Social Relationship Measures and Positive and Negative Symptoms and Overall Functioning in UHR Youth

	Positive Symptoms				Negative Symptoms				Functioning
	B(SE)	df	t	r	B(SE)	df	t	r	B(SE)	df	t	r
Social Network
Number of Close Friends	−.50(.92)	40	−1.95^	.29	−.74(.42)	41	−1.75^	.26	1.98(.98)	41	2.03*	.30
Social Network Diversity	−.14(.39)	36	−.35	.06	−.57(.59)	37	−.97	.16	3.49(1.36)	37	2.57*	.39
Social Support
ISEL	−.12(.08)	38	−1.422	.22	−.41(.12)	32	−3.38**	.51	.53(.30)	39	1.74^	.27
Relationship Quality
Family Support	−.25(.12)	41	−2.12*	.31	−.36(.19)	42	−1.80^	.27	.38(.47)	42	.79	.12
Family Strain	.28(.14)	41	2.01^	.30	.063(.23)	42	.27	.04	−.19(.55)	42	−.36	.05
Friend Support	−.33(.14)	39	−2.44*	.36	−.57(.21)	40	−2.68*	.39	.53(.48)	40	1.10	.17
Friend Strain	−.13(.17)	39	−.77	.12	−.21(.26)	40	−.81	.13	.11(.56)	40	.20	.03
Loneliness
UCLA	.11(.04)	38	2.95*	.43	.20(.06)	39	3.55**	.49	−.39(.13)	39	−3.00**	.43

Note: Analyses include only UHR participants. Functioning was measured using the GAF score from the SCID-IV.

^{^}p < .10.

^*p < .05.

^**p < .01.

^***p < .001.