Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: JAMA Neurol. 2016 Dec 1;73(12):1468–1476. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.3745

Table 3.

A comparison of the patient oriented outcomes between the lean controls and obese patients with and without neuropathy

Variable Lean
Without
Neuropathy
Obese without
neuropathy
P value* Obese with
neuropathy
P value**
Total QOL 1.4 (0.4) 1.9 (1.3) <0.01 3.4 (2.7) 0.02
Pain QOL 1.3 (0.5) 1.9 (1.2) <0.01 3.5 (2.3) <0.01
Reduced
sensation QOL
1.0 (0.1) 1.4 (0.9) <0.01 4.0 (4.0) <0.01
Sensory motor
QOL
1.5 (1.4) 1.9 (1.6) 0.13 2.7 (2.9) 0.26
ADL QOL 2.0 (1.3) 2.5 (2.6) 0.16 3.7 (3.6) 0.14
Social QOL 1.7 (0.9) 1.7 (1.4) 0.79 2.7 (2.8) 0.13
McGill Pain
score
1.0 (1.9) 2.8 (3.3) <0.01 8.2 (8.6) <0.01
VAS 6.0 (13.3) 14.8 (20.1) <0.01 27.2 (26.9) 0.02
PPI score N, (%) 0.07 0.47
Discomforting 0 (0%) 4 (5.1%) 3 (13.0%)
Mild 5 (10%) 13 (16.5%) 3 (13.0%)
No Pain 45 (90%) 61 (77.2%) 17 (73.9%)
*

comparison is between lean controls and obese participants without neuropathy

**

comparison is between obese participants with and without neuropathy

QOL= quality of life, ADL=activities of daily living, VAS=visual analogue scale, PPI=present pain intensity