Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 7;4:2. doi: 10.1186/s40658-016-0170-3

Table 3.

Details of planar and tomographic acquisitions performed to determine the CNF for 177Lu

Mode (phantom) Fig. 5 data Phantom Source info Acquisition parameters
A Planara (point source) Planar methods 1 and 2 graphic file with name 40658_2016_170_Figa_HTML.gif Activity 11.7 MBq
Volume 0.5 ml
Scan duration = 10 min
Collimator MELP
PW [187.2–228.8] keV
LSW [153.0–187.0] keV
USW [229.5–280.2] keV
B Tomographicb (uniformly hot cylinder) SPECT cylinder graphic file with name 40658_2016_170_Figb_HTML.gif Total activity 659.6 MBq
Volume 6500 ml
#Projections = 96
Time/projection = 10s
C Tomographic (6 bottles in air) SPECT air graphic file with name 40658_2016_170_Figc_HTML.gif Total activity 233.4 MBq
Vol bottles [17–199.5] ml
#Projections = 90
Time/projection = 20s
D Tomographic (6 spheres in warm water) SPECT HW1 graphic file with name 40658_2016_170_Figd_HTML.gif Total activity 489.1 MBq
Vol bottles [17–199.5] ml
#Projections = 90
Time/projection = 30s
E Tomographic (6 spheres in warm water) SPECT HW2 graphic file with name 40658_2016_170_Fige_HTML.gif Total activity 681.3 MBq
Vol bottles [17–199.5] ml
#Projections = 90
Time/projection = 30s

aThe camera sensitivity does not depend on the source-collimator distance although increase in recorded counts may occur due to septal penetration if the sources are placed very close to the collimator. To minimize this effect, in this study the point sources were placed at 30 cm from the collimator surface

bUniform cylinder was scanned at the L’Hôtel-Dieu de Québec site of the CHU de Québec–Université Laval center (Quebec City, Canada) and dual energy window was performed for scatter correction on this phantom