Table 4.
Risk factors | To BPD symptoms outcome at 11 to 12 years | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Associations via Persistent Nightmares at 2.5 to 6.8 yrs | Associations via emotional/behavioural problems at 9.5 years | |||||
β | SE | P | Β | SE | P | |
Sex | 0.004 | 0.003 | 0.197 | −0.012 a | 0.005 | 0.010 |
Emotional temperament | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.018 | 0.002 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Family adversity | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.062 | 0.006 | 0.001 | <0.001 |
Abuse | 0.015 | 0.006 | 0.018 | 0.015 | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Maladaptive parenting | 0.002 | 0.001 | 0.021 | 0.016 | 0.003 | <0.001 |
Persistent nightmares | N/A | N/A | N/A | 0.016 | 0.004 | <0.001 |
B probit coefficient, SE standard error, P probability
aNegative figure indicates male sex as variable coded as 1 = male, 2 = female; Boldface indicates significant associations; Probit co-efficients represent the change in the probability of “caseness” associated with a unit change in the independent variable, thus it is important to keep the scale of the predictor in mind when interpreting probit coefficients i.e., one would expect probit values to be larger for dichotomous predictors, which represent the change from ‘no caseness’ (i.e., no abuse) to ‘caseness’ (i.e., abuse) rather than a single value on a continuous scale (i.e., emotional temperament)