Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 17;116(1):141–148. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.378

Table 2. Pairwise agreement (kappa; standard error) between adjudicators, by country.

    Adjudicator pair
Country Study arm 1 2 3 4 5 6
Netherlands Screen 0.92 (0.04) 0.85* (0.03) 0.94 (0.03) 0.81 (0.05) 0.88* (0.04)
  Control 0.89 (0.05) 0.87 (0.04) 0.93 (0.04) 0.84 (0.05) 0.83 (0.05)
  Overall 0.91 (0.03) 0.87* (0.02) 0.94 (0.02) 0.84 (0.03) 0.86 (0.03)
Belgium Screen 0.92 (0.05) 0.89 (0.04) 0.86 (0.06) 0.93 (0.04) 0.89 (0.06) 0.92 (0.04)
  Control 0.89 (0.05) 0.89 (0.04) 0.92 (0.04) 0.91 (0.04) 0.97 (0.03) 0.95 (0.03)
  Overall 0.91 (0.03) 0.89 (0.03) 0.89 (0.04) 0.92 (0.03) 0.93 (0.03) 0.93 (0.03)
Sweden Screen 0.95 (0.02) 0.93 (0.03) 0.97 (0.02)
  Control 0.94 (0.03) 0.89 (0.03) 0.90 (0.03)
  Overall 0.94 (0.02) 0.91 (0.02) 0.94 (0.02)
Finland Screen 0.90 (0.03) 0.85 (0.04) 0.89 (0.04)
  Control 0.89 (0.03) 0.86* (0.03) 0.92* (0.03)
  Overall 0.89 (0.02) 0.86* (0.03) 0.91 (0.02)
Switzerland Screen 0.81 (0.13) 0.69 (0.17) 0.73 (0.11) 0.92 (0.08) 0.83 (0.12)  
  Control 0.31 (0.17) 0.49* (0.14) 0.75 (0.12) 1.00 (−) 1.00 (−)  
  Overall 0.57 (0.11) 0.60 (0.11) 0.74 (0.08) 0.93 (0.07) 0.86 (0.10)  

*P<0.05 on McNemar symmetry test.