Table 2. Pairwise agreement (kappa; standard error) between adjudicators, by country.
Adjudicator pair |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Country | Study arm | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
Netherlands | Screen | 0.92 (0.04) | 0.85* (0.03) | 0.94 (0.03) | 0.81 (0.05) | 0.88* (0.04) | – |
Control | 0.89 (0.05) | 0.87 (0.04) | 0.93 (0.04) | 0.84 (0.05) | 0.83 (0.05) | – | |
Overall | 0.91 (0.03) | 0.87* (0.02) | 0.94 (0.02) | 0.84 (0.03) | 0.86 (0.03) | – | |
Belgium | Screen | 0.92 (0.05) | 0.89 (0.04) | 0.86 (0.06) | 0.93 (0.04) | 0.89 (0.06) | 0.92 (0.04) |
Control | 0.89 (0.05) | 0.89 (0.04) | 0.92 (0.04) | 0.91 (0.04) | 0.97 (0.03) | 0.95 (0.03) | |
Overall | 0.91 (0.03) | 0.89 (0.03) | 0.89 (0.04) | 0.92 (0.03) | 0.93 (0.03) | 0.93 (0.03) | |
Sweden | Screen | 0.95 (0.02) | 0.93 (0.03) | 0.97 (0.02) | – | – | – |
Control | 0.94 (0.03) | 0.89 (0.03) | 0.90 (0.03) | – | – | – | |
Overall | 0.94 (0.02) | 0.91 (0.02) | 0.94 (0.02) | – | – | – | |
Finland | Screen | 0.90 (0.03) | 0.85 (0.04) | 0.89 (0.04) | – | – | – |
Control | 0.89 (0.03) | 0.86* (0.03) | 0.92* (0.03) | – | – | – | |
Overall | 0.89 (0.02) | 0.86* (0.03) | 0.91 (0.02) | – | – | – | |
Switzerland | Screen | 0.81 (0.13) | 0.69 (0.17) | 0.73 (0.11) | 0.92 (0.08) | 0.83 (0.12) | |
Control | 0.31 (0.17) | 0.49* (0.14) | 0.75 (0.12) | 1.00 (−) | 1.00 (−) | ||
Overall | 0.57 (0.11) | 0.60 (0.11) | 0.74 (0.08) | 0.93 (0.07) | 0.86 (0.10) |
*P<0.05 on McNemar symmetry test.