Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 17;116(1):141–148. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.378

Table 5. Odds ratios between prostate cancer death and study arm (screening vs control), by four estimation methods.

  Estimation method
Country Empiricala Empirical, corrected using overall estimates of adjudicator accuracyb Empirical, corrected using differential estimates of adjudicator accuracy by study armc Directly from latent class modeld
Netherlands 0.342 0.35 0.337 0.328
Belgium 0.759 0.904 0.866 0.902
Sweden 0.355 0.381 0.395 0.368
Finland 0.52 0.575 0.568 0.556
Switzerland 0.625 0.5 0.259 0.437
a

Estimated from cross-tabulation of adjudication consensus by study arm.

b

Estimated proportions of prostate cancer deaths in each study arm were corrected using estimated false positive and false negative adjudication rates in LCM 2. Odds ratio is then calculated from these corrected proportions.

c

Similar to approach (b), except that adjudicator accuracy was estimated from LCM 3.

d

Based on LCM 2 estimates of the association of study arm with the latent variable (prostate cancer death).