Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Rural Sociol. 2016 May 19;81(4):572–600. doi: 10.1111/ruso.12106

Table 2.

Multilevel Hazard Model (Odds Ratios) Estimating First Time Out-migration in Chitwan Valley of Nepal, 1997–2001 (N=3,401).

Measures Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4 Model 5
 Tractor use 1.24 (3.15)** – – – 1.23 (3.04)**
 Farm Implements – 1.06 (0.78) – – 1.05 (0.67)
 Chemical Fertilizer – – 1.04 (0.57) – 1.01 (0.09)
 Pesticides (herbicides or insecticides) – – – 0.95 (−0.49) 0.95 (−0.76)
Theoretical controls Human capital
 Enrolled in school 1.00 (−0.03) 1.02 (0.21) 1.00 (0.07) 1.00 (0.06) 1.00 (0.01)
 Years of schooling 1.04 (6.13)*** 1.04 (5.85)*** 1.04 (5.97)*** 1.04 (6.07)*** 1.04 (6.02)***
 Currently has wage job 1.07 (1.24) 1.07 (1.23) 1.06 (1.05) 1.06 (1.02) 1.08 (1.25)
 Currently has salaried job 1.69 (5.70)*** 1.69 (5.65)*** 1.69 (5.66)*** 1.69 (5.68)*** 1.69 (5.68)***
 Previous migration experience 1.01 (4.10)*** 1.01 (4.27)*** 1.01 (4.17)*** 1.01 (4.18)*** 1.01 (4.10)***
Social capital
 Household has network tie 1.60 (1.20) 1.68 (1.33) 1.72 (1.39) 1.75 (1.42) 1.61 (1.22)
 Neighborhood prevalence 1.25 (3.91)*** 1.25 (3.92)*** 1.24 (3.84)*** 1.24 (3.83)*** 1.24 (3.89)
Physical capital
 Market access 1.02 (0.57) 1.02 (0.47) 1.02 (0.63) 1.02 (0.61) 1.02 (0.57)
 Farmland 0.96 (−0.34) 0.96 (−0.03) 0.95 (−0.42) 0.96 (−0.35) 0.96 (−0.33)
 Livestock 0.97 (−1.79)+ 0.97 (−2.06)* 0.97 (−1.98)* 0.97 (−2.00)* 0.97 (−1.92)*
 House plot owned 0.66 (−3.98)*** 0.67 (−3.83)*** 0.66 (−3.96)*** 0.66 (−3.93)*** 0.65 (−4.08)***
 Home quality 0.98 (−1.52) 0.99 (−1.27) 0.99 (−1.16) 0.99 (−1.04)+ 0.98 (−1.48)
Demographic controls Gender
 Female 0.74 (−5.35)*** 0.74 (−5.28)*** 0.74 (−5.31)*** 0.75 (−5.23)*** 0.74 (−5.39)***
Age (Birth cohort)
 15–24 (1972–1981) 3.28 (11.13)*** 3.38 (11.39)*** 3.35 (11.30)*** 3.33 (11.25)*** 3.29 (11.13)***
 25–34 (1962–1971) 1.60 (4.62)*** 1.64 (4.83)*** 1.63 (4.76)*** 1.62 (5.11)*** 1.60 (4.62)***
 35–44 (1952–1961) 0.93 (−0.70) 0.96 (−0.38) 0.95 (−0.46) 0.96 (−0.45) 0.93 (−0.70)
 45–59 (1936–1951) – – – – –
Household size 1.00 (0.35) 1.01 (0.27) 1.00 (0.42) 1.00 (0.44) 1.00 (0.30)
Ethnicity
 Brahmin/Chhetri – – – – –
 Dalit 1.23 (1.91)* 1.18 (2.23) 1.19 (1.60) 1.18 (1.54) 1.22 (1.88)+
 Hill Janjati 1.27 (2.65)** 1.27 (3.07)** 1.26 (2.51)** 1.26 (2.53)** 1.22 (1.88)+
 Newar 0.80 (−1.73)+ 0.77 (−1.96)* 0.78 (−1.89)* 0.78 (−1.92)* 0.79 (−1.79)+
 Terai Janjati 0.98 (−0.21) 0.95 (−0.49) 0.95 (−0.47) 0.94 (−0.53) 0.97 (−0.28)
Duration
 Month 0.99 (−2.57)** 0.98 (−2.65)** 0.99 (−2.61)*** 0.99 (−2.61)** 0.99 (−2.59)**
 Month squared 1.00 (−0.02) 1.00 (0.04) 1.00 (0.00) 1.00 (0.99) 1.00 (0.00)
Intercept 0.01 (−19.10)*** 0.01 (−18.84)*** 0.01 (−18.61)*** 0.01 (−18.94)*** 0.01 (−18.52)***
AIC (Null Model=18160.0)# 17317.0 17326.0 17326.0 17326.0 17322.0
BIC (Null Model=18165.0) # 17394.0 17403.0 17403.0 17403.0 17408.0
−2 log LL (Null Model=18156.0) # 17265.0 17274.0 17274.0 17274.0 17264.0
+

P<.10,

*

P<.05,

**

P<.01,

***

P<.001 all probabilities are one-tailed, t-values in parenthesis

#

Smaller values compared to the null model values are considered better.