Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 4;48(1):71–78. doi: 10.1016/j.bjm.2016.09.007

Table 2.

Weighted correlation matrix showing the relationships between OTU axes and environmental variables.

Heavy metals (ppm) LC
HB
SLR
Axis 1 Axis 2 Axis 1 Axis 2 Axis 1 Axis 2
V −0.1218 −0.174 0.5192 −0.464 −0.6598 0.1421
Cr −0.0291 −0.4455 0.3533 0.547 −0.4957 0.2810
Co −0.0598 0.5549 0.6356 −0.4342 −0.3300 0.3183
Ni 0.1005 0.4973 0.4367 −0.4536 −0.2117 0.3611
Cu 0.0773 −0.2347 0.4933 −0.3405 0.0845 0.4293
Zn 0.0762 0.9036 0.2873 −0.2502 0.2989 0.8420
Hg 0.7057 −0.4008 0.1366 −0.1411 0.7263 −0.1899
As 0.5242 0.0560 0.1992 0.6720 0.8680 0.0094
Se 0.2599 0.1956 0.2976 −0.0247 0.5057 0.8242
Mo −0.1019 −0.2265 0.2932 −0.4624 0.8483 0.3074
Cd −0.0784 0.4242 0.1914 −0.4372 0.0050 0.5001
Sb −0.0635 0.3020 0.0283 0.6048 −0.0301 0.2426
Pb 0.2412 −0.0013 0.4615 −0.4401 0.1233 0.5349
U 0.0022 0.0913 0.6078 −0.2582 −0.4108 0.6724
Eigenvalues 0.672 0.632 0.557 0.459 0.530 0.275
Cumulative percentage variance of OUT-environment relation 26.2 50.7 31.7 57.8 47.2 71.6

Heavily and medium contaminated stations: LC, Licunhe estuary; HB, Haibohe estuary; Low-grade contaminated control station: SLR, Shilaoren Beach. Bold type indicates the three strongest factors correlated with the first two CCA ordination axes.