Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 26;12(1):79–86. doi: 10.2215/CJN.03390316

Table 2.

Risk (95% CI) of incident ESRD by frequency of diet soda consumption

Variables Categories of Diet Soda Consumption, glasses/wk P Value for Trend Continuous Diet Soda Consumption
<1 (n=6678) 1–4 (n=2728) 5–7 (n=3885) >7 (n=2077) HR (95% CI) P value
ESRD, n (%) 125 (1.9) 42 (1.5) 116 (3.0) 73 (3.5) <0.001
Model 1 1 (Ref) 1.32 (0.91 to 1.89) 2.21 (1.69 to 2.88) 3.27 (2.40 to 4.45) <0.001 1.53 (1.40 to 1.67) <0.001
Model 2 1 (Ref) 1.08 (0.75 to 1.55) 1.33 (1.01 to 1.75) 1.83 (1.01 to 2.52) <0.001 1.29 (1.16 to 1.43) <0.001
Model 3a 1 (Ref) 1.08 (0.75 to 1.55) 1.33 (1.01 to 1.75) 1.83 (1.33 to 2.53) <0.001 1.29 (1.17 to 1.43) <0.001
Model 3b 1 (Ref) 1.03 (0.71 to 1.48) 1.22 (0.92 to 1.62) 1.71 (1.23 to 2.38) 0.001 1.27 (1.14 to 1.41) <0.001
Model 3c 1 (Ref) 1.03 (0.71 to 1.48) 1.24 (0.94 to 1.64) 1.64 (1.18 to 2.28) 0.002 1.25 (1.12 to 1.39) <0.001

Model 1: Adjusted for age, sex, race-center, education level, smoking status, physical activity, total caloric intake, baseline eGFR (linear spline terms with one knot at 90 ml/min per 1.73 m2). Model 2: Model 1 + body mass index category, diabetes, systolic BP, serum uric acid. Model 3a: Model 2 + dietary acid load. Model 3b: Model 2 + diet quality (modified Alternative Healthy Eating Index 2010), dietary sodium, dietary fructose, frequency of consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages. Model 3c: Model 2 + dietary phosphorus. 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; –, not applicable.