Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 26;12(1):79–86. doi: 10.2215/CJN.03390316

Table 3.

Risk (95% CI) of incident ESRD by frequency of sugar-sweetened beverage consumption

Variables Categories of SSB Consumption, glasses/wk P value for trend Continuous SSB Consumption
<1 (n=5204) 1–4 (n=3766) 5–7 (n=3870) >7 (n=2525) HR (95% CI) P value
ESRD, n (%) 117 (2.3) 92 (2.4) 101 (2.6) 46 (1.8) 0.23
Model 1 1 (Ref) 0.90 (0.68 to 1.19) 0.58 (0.43 to 0.78) 0.32 (0.21 to 0.47) <0.001 0.63 (0.52 to 0.77) <0.001
Model 2 1 (Ref) 1.30 (0.88 to 1.92) 1.12 (0.74 to 1.71) 0.68 (0.40 to 1.16) 0.05 0.86 (0.68 to 1.08) 0.20
Model 3a 1 (Ref) 1.30 (0.88 to 1.92) 1.12 (0.74 to 1.70) 0.68 (0.40 to 1.16) 0.05 0.86 (0.68 to 1.08) 0.20
Model 3b 1 (Ref) 1.35 (0.91 to 2.01) 1.09 (0.69 to 1.71) 0.52 (0.27 to 1.00) 0.01 0.73 (0.53 to 0.99) 0.05
Model 3c 1 (Ref) 1.32 (0.89 to 1.96) 1.16 (0.76 to 1.79) 0.73 (0.41 to 1.32) 0.11 0.90 (0.69 to 1.16) 0.42

Model 1: Adjusted for age, sex, race-center, education level, smoking status, physical activity, total caloric intake, baseline eGFR (linear spline terms with one knot at 90 ml/min per 1.73 m2). Model 2: Model 1 + body mass index category, diabetes, systolic BP, serum uric acid. Model 3a: Model 2 + dietary acid load. Model 3b: Model 2 + diet quality (modified Alternative Healthy Eating Index 2010), dietary sodium, dietary fructose, frequency of consumption of diet soda. Model 3c: Model 2 + dietary phosphorus. 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; SBB, sugar-sweetened beverage; HR, hazard ratio; –, not applicable.