Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 28;5(6):937–956. doi: 10.1002/mbo3.391

Table 1.

Reported efficacy of various disinfectants against Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Disinfectant Suspended or biofilm cells Experimental scale Disinfectant dose Contact time (min) Initial cell concentration (cfu/mL) Log reduction Strain; resistance or recovery References
Chlorine Suspended Laboratory 0.5 mg Cl2/L __ 1 106 4 PAO1 Xue et al. (2013)
Laboratory 0.5 mg Cl2/L 30 8 × 10−1 0.6 Env.—river water Shrivastava et al. (2004)
Laboratory 0.1–0.6 mg Cl2/L 5 106 0.4–4.3 Env.—water system biofilm Grobe et al. (2001)
Biofilm Laboratory 0.5 mg Cl2/L 30 106 1.7 PAO1 biofilm Kim et al. (2000)2009
Laboratory 5.8 mg Cl2/L 60 nd 2 Env. Van der Wende (1991)
Monochloramine Suspended Laboratory 2 mg Cl2/L 30 106 5 PAO1 Xue et al. (2013)
Biofilm Laboratory 4 mg Cl2/L 60 3.8 × 1012 cfu/m2 4 ERC1—hydraulic system biofilm Chen et al. (1993)
Chlorine dioxide Suspended Laboratory 0.5 mg Cl2/L 30 107 5 Env. Behnke and Camper (2012)
1.5 mg Cl2/L 30 107 7 Env.
Biofilm Laboratory 1.5 mg Cl2/L 30 107 __ 1 Env. Behnke and Camper (2012)
Silver ions Suspended Laboratory 5 mg/L 20 3 × 107 2 PAO1 wild‐type BAA‐47; resistance over time Wu (2010)
Laboratory 0.08 mg/L 720 3 × 106 6 Env. Huang et al. (2008)
Laboratory 0.1 mg/L 480 106 5.5 ATCC27313 Silvestry‐Rodriguez et al., 2007;
Biofilm Laboratory 5 mg/L 20 6.3 × 107 1 PAO1 wild‐type BAA‐47; resistance over time Wu (2010)
Laboratory 10 mg/L 30 106 0.6 PAO1 biofilm Kim et al. (2000)
Copper ions Suspended Laboratory 0.6 mg/L 600 106 6 Env.—plumbing biofilm; full recovery Dwidjosiswojo et al. (2011)
Laboratory 0.1 mg/L 90 3 × 106 6 Env. Huang et al. (2008)
Laboratory 2 mg/L 300 106 6 PAO1 wild type Teitzel and Parsek (2003)
Biofilm Laboratory 16 mg/L 300 3 × 107 3.5 PAO1 wild type; resistance to copper observed Teitzel and Parsek (2003)
Ozone Suspended Laboratory 0.6 ppm 6 106 1 Env. Zuma et al. (2009)
3.14 ppm 2 106 4 Env.
Laboratory 0.37 ppm 0.5; 5 OD600 = 1.75–2.0 1.07; 1.4 ATCC27853 Zhang et al. (2015)
Biofilm Not reported
Thermal shock Suspended Hospital 70°C 30 Not applicable Env. strains; contamination at the tap eliminated after thermal shock treatments Van der Mee‐Marquet et al. (2005)
Hospital 75°C 60 Bukholm et al. (2002)
Biofilm Laboratory 65°C 2 108 cfu/cm2 5 PAO1 Park et al. (2011)
Laboratory 85°C 1 4 × 104 cfu/cm2 2–3 ATCC9027 Kisko and Szabo‐Szabo (2011)

Env., Environmental isolate.