Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 9;12(1):e0167670. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167670

Table 3. Subgroup analysis of trials in the last 10 years: stenting vs. non-stenting.

Outcome of interest No. of studies No. of patients OR/WMD (95% CI) p-value Study heterogeneity
Stented/Unstented Chi2 df I2 p-value
Operation time, min 11 689/686 4.18 [1.05, 7.31] 0.009 99.45 10 90% <0.001
Readmission rate 6 462/460 0.74 [0.42, 1.31] 0.30 5.42 5 8% 0.37
Hospital stay, day 4 119/125 1.97 [-0.12, 4.05] 0.06 4.41 3 32% 0.22
Stone free rate 6 318/339 0.53 [0.31, 0.89] 0.02 2.14 5 0% 0.83
Visual analogue score 6 352/345 0.40 [-0.08, 0.88] 0.10 38.15 5 87% <0.001
Pain rate 10 692/692 2.67 [1.26, 5.65] 0.01 54.26 9 83% <0.001
Dysuria rate 7 490/488 3.60 [2.66, 4.86] <0.001 7.94 6 24% 0.24
Hematuria rate 8 494/494 3.31 [1.55, 7.05] 0.002 24.55 7 71% <0.001
Irritative symptom rate 6 414/411 4.23 [1.64, 10.91] 0.003 34.13 5 85% <0.001
Urinary infection rate 5 405/403 2.01 [0.98, 4.14] 0.06 10.66 4 62% 0.03
Fever rate 6 352/352 0.83 [0.51, 1.35] 0.45 0.77 5 0% 0.98

CI = confidence interval; OR = odds ratio; WMD = weighted mean difference

Values of WMD.

Statistically significant results are shown in bold.