Table 2.
Hierarchical logistic regression models of binge drinking (N = 20,487).
| Variables | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | Model 5 | Model 6 | Model 7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| OR | OR | OR | OR | OR | OR | OR | |
| Level-1 Fixed Effects | |||||||
| Black | 0.617*** | 0.715*** | 0.729*** | 0.789*** | 0.734*** | 0.718*** | 0.743*** |
| Hispanic | 0.925† | 0.848** | 0.853** | 0.926 | 0.850** | 0.840*** | 0.851** |
| Other | 0.780*** | 0.874* | 0.867* | 0.936 | 0.874* | 0.866* | 0.880* |
| Prior Binge Drinking | 3.216*** | 3.213*** | 3.210*** | 3.207*** | 3.215*** | 3.209*** | |
| Family SES | 1.007 | 1.000 | 1.006 | 1.004 | 1.007 | 1.007 | |
| Male | 1.137*** | 1.137*** | 1.134*** | 1.139*** | 1.138*** | 1.137*** | |
| Age | 1.369*** | 1.370*** | 1.373*** | 1.370*** | 1.369*** | 1.369*** | |
| Two Bio Parent HH | 0.915** | 0.912** | 0.912** | 0.912** | 0.916*** | 0.918* | |
| Grades | 1.123*** | 1.126*** | 1.125*** | 1.125*** | 1.120*** | 1.119*** | |
| Peer Use | 1.282*** | 1.281*** | 1.280*** | 1.281*** | 1.283*** | 1.281*** | |
| Level-2 Fixed Effects | |||||||
| Neighborhood Advantage | 2.142*** | ||||||
| Black Neighborhood | 0.826* | ||||||
| Hispanic Neighborhood | 0.784* | ||||||
| Integrated Neighborhood | 0.856*** | ||||||
| Alcohol Availability | 1.519** | ||||||
| Conservative Denomination | 0.871 | ||||||
| Low Religiosity | 1.176* | ||||||
| Intercept | 1.107*** | 0.003*** | 0.003*** | 0.003*** | 0.003*** | 0.003*** | 0.003*** |
| Random Effect | |||||||
| Tau | 0.260 | 0.199 | 0.194 | 0.189 | 0.196 | 0.198 | 0.192 |
| F | 48.29*** | 323.21*** | 294.71*** | 249.27*** | 291.15*** | 293.73*** | 288.01*** |
| Variables | Model 8 | Model 9 | Model 10 | Model 11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| OR | OR | OR | OR | |
| Level-2 Fixed Effects | ||||
| Neighborhood Advantage | 2.325*** | 1.874** | ||
| Black Neighborhood | 0.751 | 0.865† | 0.878 | |
| Hispanic Neighborhood | 0.761 | 0.971 | 0.769* | |
| Integrated Neighborhood | 0.819 | 0.915 | 0.944 | |
| Alcohol Availability | 1.246 | |||
| Conservative Denomination | ||||
| Low Religiosity | 1.102 | |||
| N’Hood Advantage* Black | 0.381* | 0.328* | ||
| N’Hood Advantage* Hisp | 2.157 | |||
| N’Hood Advantage* Other | 0.782 | |||
| Black* Black N’Hood | 1.203 | |||
| Black* Hispanic N’Hood | 1.374 | |||
| Black* Integrated N’Hood | 1.191† | 1.019 | ||
| Hispanic* Black N’Hood | 0.741 | |||
| Hispanic* Hispanic N’Hood | 0.715 | |||
| Hispanic* Integrated N’Hood | 0.773* | 0.809* | ||
| Intercept | 0.003*** | 0.003 | 0.003*** | 0.003*** |
| Random Effect | ||||
| Tau | 0.190 | 0.185 | 0.184 | 0.170 |
| F | 232.24*** | 202.75*** | 203.10*** | 167.04*** |
p < .1,
p < .05,
p < .01,
p < .001;
SE and confidence intervals are omitted due to space constraints; these models also control for all the level-1 effects from previous models.