Table 1.
Characteristic | Level | Cases (n = 145) |
Controls (n = 236) |
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Sex | Female | 73 (50%) | 120 (54%)a | |
Male | 72 (50%) | 104 (46%) | ||
| ||||
Age Group | < 5 years | 9 (6%) | 32 (14%) | |
5–10 years | 4 (3%) | 33 (14%) | ||
11–20 years | 14 (10%) | 52 (22%) | ||
21–30 years | 19 (13%) | 50 (21%) | ||
31–40 years | 9 (6%) | 23 (10%) | ||
41–50 years | 23 (16%) | 21 (9%) | ||
51–60 years | 35 (24%) | 17 (7%) | ||
61–70 years | 14 (10%) | 5 (2%) | ||
70+ years | 18 (12%) | 3 (1%) | ||
| ||||
State | Alaska | 11 (8%) | 22 (9%) | |
Arizona | 47 (32%) | 49 (21%) | ||
Oklahoma | 37 (26%) | 74 (31%) | ||
New Mexico | 47 (32%) | 85 (36%) | ||
Wyoming | 3 (2%) | 6 (3%) | ||
| ||||
Residence Typeb | Urban | 3 (4%) | 19 (9%) | |
Large Rural | 17 (19%) | 81 (38%) | ||
Small Rural | 8 (9%) | 16 (8%) | ||
Isolated | 60 (68%) | 94 (45%) | ||
| ||||
Race (when asked for a single race) | AI/AN | 25 (17%) | 27 (11%) | |
White | 110 (76%) | 169 (72%) | ||
Asian | 0 (0%) | 14 (6%) | ||
Black | 5 (4%) | 3 (1%) | ||
Other | 3 (2%) | 23 (10%)c | ||
Unknown | 2 (1%) | 0 (0%) | ||
| ||||
AI/AN race (alone or in combination) | 32 (22%) | 38 (16%) | ||
| ||||
Specimen Collection Date | Summer (May – Aug) | 17 (12%) | 27 (11%) | |
Fall (Sept – Oct) | 96 (66%) | 170 (72%) | ||
Late Fall (Nov – Dec) | 32 (22%) | 39 (17%) | ||
| ||||
Number of Controls per Case | 1 | 54 (37%) | ||
2 | 91 (63%) | |||
| ||||
Time from specimen collection date of case and matched controls | ≤ 14 days | 193 (82%) | ||
15 – 30 days | 14 (6%) | |||
31 – 60 days | 13 (5%) | |||
≥ 60 days | 16 (7%) | |||
| ||||
Number and % of cases without an interview of the case-proxy | 43 (29.7%) | |||
| ||||
Diagnostic Test for Influenzad | Culture | 28 (19%) | 10 (4%) | |
PCR | 98 (68%) | 209 (89%) | ||
Rapid enzyme immunoassay | 16 (11%) | 15 (6%) | ||
Fluorescent AB | 3 (2%) | 2 (1%) |
Twelve outpatient controls did not have a chart review completed and sex was not determined.
Residence type only available on 88 (61%) of the cases and 210 (89%) of the controls.
22 persons listed “Hispanic” as their race and one person listed “Filipino”
Results reflect medical chart review results. All controls were reported to the state health department as having a positive culture or PCR for pH1N1.