Table 3.
Resident characteristic | Odds ratio (95% confidence interval) | |
---|---|---|
DAL (n = 1089)a | LTC (n = 1000)b | |
Sociodemographic | ||
Age, years | ||
65–79 (ref gp) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
80–85 | 0.72 (0.49–1.06)** | 0.65 (0.43–1.00)* |
86–89 | 0.67 (0.42–1.06)** | 0.57 (0.34–0.96)* |
≥90 | 0.64 (0.40–1.01)** | 0.60 (0.38–0.96)* |
Sex | ||
Male | 1.15 (0.80–1.65) | 1.22 (0.87–1.72) |
Facility length of stay, months | ||
<12 (ref gp) | 1.00 | |
12–24 | 1.36 (0.95–1.96)** | |
>24 | 1.66 (1.17–2.35)* | |
Health and functional status | ||
Dementia and treatment status | ||
No dementia (ref gp) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Dementia, not treated | 2.73 (1.98–3.74)* | 1.97 (1.37–2.84)* |
Dementia, treated | 2.45 (1.55–3.86)* | 3.09 (1.91–5.00)* |
Psychiatric diagnoses | 2.06 (1.27–3.33)* | 2.14 (1.48–3.11)* |
Delusions/hallucinations | 1.76 (0.99–3.14)** | 2.01 (1.35–3.00)* |
Cardiovascular disease | 0.73 (0.54–1.00)* | |
Cerebrovascular disease | 0.55 (0.34–0.89)* | |
Antidepressants | 1.99 (1.43–2.75)* | 2.18 (1.56–3.05)* |
Anxiolytics | 1.82 (1.17–2.81)* | |
Sedatives/hypnotics | 1.56 (1.06–2.28)* | |
FI | ||
Robust (FI score <0.2) (ref gp) | 1.00 | |
Pre-frail (FI score 0.2–0.3) | 1.18 (0.79–1.74) | |
Frail (FI score >0.3) | 1.92 (1.29–2.86)* | |
FI (binary)c | ||
Robust/pre-frail (FI score ≤0.3) | 1.00 | |
Frail (FI score >0.3) | 1.82 (1.15–2.87)* | |
Physical restraints | 1.35 (0.97–1.89)** | |
Behavioral characteristics | ||
Aggressive behavior (ABS score) | ||
None (0) (ref gp) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Moderate (1–2) | 1.41 (0.86–2.30) | 1.53 (1.00–2.35)** |
Severe to very severe (≥3) | 2.12 (1.37–3.29)* | 2.05 (1.36–3.09)* |
Elopement attempts or threatsd | 1.63 (1.05–2.54)* | 1.68 (1.07–2.62)* |
Wanderingd | 1.48 (0.99–2.23)** |
ABS Aggressive Behavior Scale, AL assisted living, DAL designated assisted living, FI Frailty Index, LTC long-term care, ref gp reference group
aThe full multivariable logistic model for DAL adjusts for: age, sex, dementia/treatment status, psychiatric diagnoses, presence of delusions/hallucinations, frailty status, cardiovascular diagnoses, cerebrovascular diagnoses, AL length of stay, ABS score, elopement attempts or threats, and use of antidepressant medication
bThe full multivariable logistic model for LTC adjusts for: age, sex, dementia/treatment status, psychiatric diagnoses, presence of delusions/hallucinations, frailty status, ABS score, elopement attempts or threats, wandering, use of physical restraints, and use of antidepressant, anxiolytic, and sedative/hypnotic medications
cBecause of the small sample of LTC residents found to be robust by the FI, a binary variable was used for LTC analyses (robust/pre-frail residents combined for comparison with frail residents)
dBecause of collinearity, the variables elopement attempts/threats and wandering could not be retained together in the fully-adjusted model for DAL. Elopement attempts/threats was retained in the model on the basis of its p-value (p = 0.030) compared with wandering (p = 0.044) when included separately in the full model
* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.1