Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 21;34(1):29–38. doi: 10.1007/s40266-016-0418-6

Table 2.

Onset of exposure and glucose-lowering effect after administration of faster aspart versus insulin aspart (0.2 U/kg) in elderly subjects with type 1 diabetes mellitus

Faster asparta Insulin asparta Treatment ratiob [95% CI] Treatment differencec [95% CI] p valued
Onset of exposure
 Onset of appearance (min) 2.4 5.2 0.45 [0.30–0.60] –2.9 [–3.8 to −1.9] <0.001
 t Early 50% Cmax (min) 18.2 28.0 0.65 [0.56–0.74] –9.8 [–12.7 to −7.0] <0.001
 t max (min) 57.2 64.2 0.89 [0.75–1.06] –7.0 [–17.6 to 3.6] 0.187
Onset of glucose-lowering effect
 Onset of action (min) 19.0 29.1 0.65 [0.51–0.81] –10.2 [–15.3 to −5.1] <0.001
 t Early 50% GIRmax (min) 32.1 37.7 0.85 [0.77–0.94] –5.6 [–9.0 to −2.2] 0.003
 tGIRmax (min) 136.2 145.8 0.93 [0.79–1.10] –9.6 [–33.7 to 14.5] 0.415

CI confidence interval, t Early 50% Cmax time to 50% of maximum insulin aspart concentration in the early part of the pharmacokinetic profile, t Early 50% GIRmax time to 50% of maximum glucose infusion rate in the early part of the glucose infusion rate profile, tGIR max time to maximum glucose infusion rate, t max time to maximum insulin aspart concentration

aData are least square means

bFaster aspart/insulin aspart (calculated using Fieller’s method)

cFaster aspart – insulin aspart

dFor treatment comparison of faster aspart versus insulin aspart