Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 22;100(1):31–39. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.11.015

Table 2.

Sibling Pair Simulations of Family-Biased Ascertainment with Shared Environment

M n Sibling Set Prevalence Set ATT MLM CARAT LTMLM LT-Fam
50,000 1,000 unbiased 1% causal 10.197 (0.499) 8.247 (0.398) 9.234 (0.452) NA 9.494 (0.473)
null 1.156 (0.001) 0.911 (0.001) 1.085 (0.001) NA 1.028 (0.001)
all 1.158 (0.001) 0.912 (0.001) 1.086 (0.001) NA 1.030 (0.001)
all λGC 1.160 (0.019) 0.908 (0.009) 1.081 (0.002) NA 1.031 (0.002)
concord causal 43.852 (1.674) 20.635 (0.8) 30.93 (1.22) 41.279 (1.577) 30.748 (1.213)
null 1.509 (0.001) 0.685 (0.001) 1.017 (0.001) 1.469 (0.001) 1.010 (0.001)
all 1.517 (0.001) 0.689 (0.001) 1.023 (0.001) 1.477 (0.001) 1.016 (0.001)
all λGC 1.514 (0.002) 0.686 (0.001) 1.019 (0.001) 1.471 (0.008) 1.012 (0.001)
discord causal 17.675 (0.746) 17.675 (0.746) 35.169 (1.497) 10.471 (0.434) 35.425 (1.506)
null 0.505 (0.001) 0.505 (0.001) 0.997 (0.001) 0.885 (0.001) 1.009 (0.001)
all 0.508 (0.001) 0.508 (0.001) 1.004 (0.001) 0.887 (0.001) 1.016 (0.001)
all λGC 0.517 (0.001) 0.517 (0.001) 1.052 (0.001) 0.889 (0.007) 1.010 (0.002)

We report average association statistics (S.E. in parentheses) at causal markers, null markers, and all markers, as well as λGC computed using all markers, for each method at various simulation parameter settings. NA indicates either lack of convergence or a singular phenotypic covariance matrix.