Table 4.
Calibration Results on Downsampled CARe T2D Samples
| Down Sampling | n | Number Cases | Number Controls | ATT | MLM | CARAT | LT-Fam |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| none | 7,024 | 1,259 | 5,765 | 1.149 (0.002) | 1.144 (0.002) | 1.149 (0.002) | 1.032 (0.002) |
| concord | 5,349 | 184 | 5,165 | 1.729 (0.003) | 10.292 (0.016) | 1.730 (0.003) | 1.016 (0.002) |
| discord | 174 | 87 | 87 | 0.606 (0.001) | 0.606 (0.001) | 0.602 (0.001) | 1.007 (0.002) |
We report average association statistics (S.E. in parentheses) across all markers for each method. We analyze the entire dataset, a concordant relative downsampled dataset, and discordant relative downsampled dataset.