Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 27;2016:4292585. doi: 10.1155/2016/4292585

Table 2.

BICAMS outcomes in treatment versus control groups.

Treatment (n = 17) Control (n = 18) Mean difference 95% CI p
Mean (SD) Mean (SD)

BICAMS improvement at follow-up (time 2 versus time 1)
SDMT gain 3.94 (5.08) −0.63 (3.30) 4.56 1.47 to 7.66 0.005
CVLT gain 6.67 (7.56) 4.06 (10.10) 2.71 −3.45 to 8.87 0.377
BVMT gain 4.65 (5.18) 1.94 (4.17) 2.70 −0.52 to 5.93 0.098

Treatment (n = 17) Control (n = 14) Mean difference 95% CI p
Mean (SD) Mean (SD)

BICAMS improvement at follow-up (time 3 versus time 1)
SDMT gain 3.35 (4.17) 4.57 (7.21) −1.28 −5.45 to 3.01 0.582
CVLT gain 6.94 (7.01) 7.50 (8.83) −0.56 −6.38 to 5.26 0.849
BVMT gain 7.29 (5.07) 4.14 (5.32) 3.15 −0.68 to 6.98 0.105

SDMT: Symbol Digits Modalities Test; CVLT: California Verbal Learning Test; BVMT: Brief Visuospatial Memory Test.