Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 10;3(6):ENEURO.0184-16.2016. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0184-16.2016

Table 3:

Statistical table

Figure/section Description/data structure Test Statistical value p value
Behavioral analysis
Methods: task design Number of trials remembered out of sequence in EEG: average of out of sequence trials spatial vs nonspatial Paired t test t(20) = 0.4 0.68
Number of trials remembered out of sequence in fMRI average of out of sequence trials spatial vs nonspatial Paired t test t(22) = −0.168 0. 87
Results: Behavioral Performance and Figure 2 Memory performance EEG: relative number of remembered items spatial vs nonspatial Paired t test t(20) = 10.23 0.0001
Memory performance fMRI: relative number of remembered items spatial vs nonspatial Paired t test t(22) = 6.26 0.0001
EEG analysis
Results: EEG scalp level and Figure 3A FOI analysis theta band: SME: forgotten vs remembered trials, 1–10 Hz, −1 to 3 s 3D cluster permutation statistic One sig. neg. cluster tsum = −55,635 pcorr = 0.03
FOI analysis Theta band: condition difference, spatial vs Nonspatial, 1–10 Hz, −1 to 3 s 3D cluster permutation statistic One sig. neg. cluster tsum = −287,990 pcorr = 0.002
FOI analysis Theta band: Interaction SME spatial vs SME nonspatial, 1–10 Hz, −1 to 3 s 3D cluster permutation statistic no sig. cluster Min. pcorr = 0.68
FOI analysis theta band: spatial remembered vs nonspatial remembered, 1–10 Hz, −1 to 3 s 3D cluster permutation statistic One sig. neg. cluster Tsum = −158380 pcorr = 0.002
Results: EEG scalp level and Figure 3B SME: forgotten vs remembered trials, 1–30 Hz, −1 to 3 s Sliding cluster permutation statistic Coherent sig. bins in alpha/beta band
Condition difference: spatial vs nonspatial, 1–30 Hz, −1 to 3 s Sliding cluster permutation statistic Coherent sig. bins in alpha/beta band
Interaction: SME spatial vs SME nonspatial, 1–30 Hz, −1 to 3 s Sliding cluster permutation statistic no coherent sig. bins (min. 3 time × 4 frequency bins)
Results: EEG scalp level and Figure 3C Topoplot: SME theta, 3–7 Hz, 0.5–3 s 1D cluster permutation statistic One sig. neg. cluster tsum = −75.85 pcorr = 0.004
Topoplot: SME alpha/beta, 15–30 Hz, 1–3 s 1D cluster permutation statistic Two sig. pos. clusters tsum = 29.60 and 19.34 pcorr = 0.012, pcorr = 0.042
Topoplot: condition difference theta 3–7 Hz, −1 to 3 s 1D cluster permutation statistic One sig. neg. cluster tsum = −239.30 pcorr = 0.002
Topoplot: condition difference alpha/beta, 10–15 Hz, 1–3 s 1D cluster permutation statistic One sig. pos. cluster tsum = 104.43 pcorr = 0.012
Results: EEG source analysis and Figure 5 Virtual electrode statistic: SME theta in right MTL, 2–10 Hz, −1 to 3 s 1D cluster permutation statistic No sig. cluster Min. pcorr = 0.20
Virtual electrode statistic: SME theta in left MTL, 2–10 Hz, −1 to 3 s 1D cluster permutation statistic One sig. neg. cluster tsum = −246.33 pcorr = 0.014
Virtual electrode statistic: condition difference in right MTL, 2–10 Hz, −1 to 3 s 1D cluster permutation statistic Two sig. neg. clusters Tsum = −588.36 and −562.18 pcorr = 0.006, pcorr = 0.006
Virtual electrode statistic: condition difference in left MTL, 2–10 Hz, −1 to 3 s 1D cluster permutation statistic Two sig. neg. clusters tsum = −682.99 and −516.30 pcorr = 0.002, pcorr = 0.004
Results: EEG source analysis and Figure 6
Source statistic: SME theta 1D cluster permutation statistic One sig. neg. cluster tsum = −3140.3 pcorr = 0.003
Sourcestatistic: SME alpha/beta 1D cluster permutation statistic One sig. pos. cluster tsum = 433.72 pcorr = 0.054
Sourcestatistic: condition difference alpha/beta 1D cluster permutation statistic One sig. pos. cluster tsum = 2692.8 pcorr = 0.0034
EEG and fMRI ROI analysis
Results: EEG source analysis and Figure 7 SME: forgotten vs remembered, average theta power MTL 3–7 Hz, −1 to 3 s 2 × 2 ANOVA, main effect F(1,20) = 10.08 0.005
condition difference: spatial vs nonspatial, average theta power lMTL 3–7 Hz, −1 to 3 s 2 × 2 ANOVA, main effect F(1,20) = 43.87 <0.0001
Interaction: SME spatial vs SME nonspatial, average theta power lMTL 3–7 Hz, −1 to 3 s 2 × 2 ANOVA, interaction effect F(1,20) = 0.001 0.97
Results: EEG source analysis and Figure 7 SME: forgotten vs remembered, average beta weights MTL 2 × 2 ANOVA, main effect F(1,22) = 10.20 0.004
condition difference: spatial vs nonspatial, average beta weights MTL 2 × 2 ANOVA, main effect F(1,22) = 16.23 0.001
Interaction: SME spatial vs SME nonspatial average beta weights MTL 2 × 2 ANOVA, interaction effect F(1,22) = 2.84 0.13

Min., Minimum; neg., negative; pos., positive; sig., significant.