Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 8;53(12):4205–4215. doi: 10.1007/s13197-016-2408-4

Table 3.

Dissipation of pirimiphos methyl residues during yeast fermentation with S. cerevisiae in wheat substrate

Fortification level (mg kg−1) Residual concentration after sterilization (mg kg−1)A SamplesB Temperature (°C) Residual concentration (mg kg−1) at different times (days) kD(×10−1) day−1
0C 1 (24 h) 2 (48 h) 3 (72 h)
5.01 3.22 ± 0.12 Control 23 2.85 ± 0.15 2.62 ± 0.50 2.56 ± 0.03 2.56 ± 0.07 0.58
Sample I 2.87 ± 0.03 2.10 ± 0.04 2.09 ± 0.06 1.80 ± 0.05 2.09
Sample II 2.86 ± 0.04 2.11 ± 0.03 2.11 ± 0.05 1.76 ± 0.06 2.06
Sample III 2.88 ± 0.06 2.08 ± 0.06 2.02 ± 0.06 1.79 ± 0.04 2.20
Control 30 2.85 ± 0.15 2.64 ± 0.33 2.61 ± 0.19 2.60 ± 0.18 0.50
Sample I 2.87 ± 0.03 2.11 ± 0.06 1.77 ± 0.05 1.25 ± 0.07 2.75
Sample II 2.86 ± 0.04 2.09 ± 0.05 1.70 ± 0.05 1.24 ± 0.05 2.84
Sample III 2.88 ± 0.06 2.08 ± 0.04 1.60 ± 0.03 1.22 ± 0.07 3.02
Control 37 2.85 ± 0.15 2.63 ± 0.28 2.61 ± 0.29 2.60 ± 0.53 0.52
Sample I 2.87 ± 0.03 1.75 ± 0.05 1.56 ± 0.06 1.50 ± 0.05 3.39
Sample II 2.86 ± 0.04 1.72 ± 0.06 1.54 ± 0.05 1.42 ± 0.08 3.50
Sample III 2.88 ± 0.06 1.72 ± 0.04 1.56 ± 0.05 1.49 ± 0.04 3.47
25.11 14.56 ± 0.21 Control 23 14.31 ± 0.12 11.71 ± 0.14 11.60 ± 0.10 11.29 ± 0.13 1.28
Sample I 14.25 ± 0.10 10.04 ± 0.25 9.96 ± 0.38 9.66 ± 0.22 2.20
Sample II 14.13 ± 0.11 10.38 ± 0.29 10.12 ± 0.27 9.74 ± 0.28 2.00
Sample III 14.53 ± 0.14 10.44 ± 0.26 10.07 ± 0.23 9.87 ± 0.23 2.14
Control 30 14.31 ± 0.12 11.78 ± 0.15 11.70 ± 0.10 11.50 ± 0.13 1.23
Sample I 14.25 ± 0.10 9.93 ± 0.18 9.10 ± 0.30 7.89 ± 0.33 2.61
Sample II 14.13 ± 0.11 10.06 ± 0.20 9.35 ± 0.25 7.62 ± 0.24 2.51
Sample III 14.53 ± 0.14 10.60 ± 0.15 9.44 ± 0.22 7.74 ± 0.21 2.47
25.11 14.56 ± 0.21 Control 37 14.31 ± 0.12 11.83 ± 0.11 11.37 ± 0.12 11.35 ± 0.15 1.28
Sample I 14.25 ± 0.10 9.77 ± 0.18 9.43 ± 0.38 8.16 ± 0.27 2.57
Sample II 14.13 ± 0.11 9.55 ± 0.28 9.47 ± 0.32 7.96 ± 0.25 2.61
Sample III 14.53 ± 0.14 9.64 ± 0.27 9.38 ± 0.20 8.01 ± 0.25 2.76
75.56 39.29 ± 0.25 Control 23 38.16 ± 0.54 37.81 ± 0.47 36.55 ± 0.55 36.40 ± 0.54 0.16
Sample I 38.72 ± 0.61 38.46 ± 0.72 33.26 ± 0.61 32.76 ± 0.74 0.46
Sample II 39.04 ± 0.52 37.90 ± 0.93 33.45 ± 0.57 31.47 ± 0.68 0.60
Sample III 37.76 ± 0.58 37.86 ± 0.88 33.60 ± 0.60 32.55 ± 0.63 0.35
Control 30 38.16 ± 0.54 37.32 ± 0.63 37.32 ± 0.58 36.49 ± 0.50 0.16
Sample I 38.72 ± 0.61 34.04 ± 0.76 32.74 ± 0.64 29.92 ± 0.91 1.00
Sample II 39.04 ± 0.52 34.56 ± 0.67 31.98 ± 0.75 28.07 ± 0.54 1.11
Sample III 37.76 ± 0.58 33.42 ± 0.68 30.89 ± 0.61 28.30 ± 0.55 1.06
Control 37 38.16 ± 0.54 36.78 ± 0.66 35.94 ± 0.64 35.79 ± 0.67 0.29
Sample I 38.72 ± 0.61 34.65 ± 0.82 30.66 ± 0.94 29.49 ± 0.65 1.06
Sample II 39.04 ± 0.52 32.58 ± 0.96 29.76 ± 0.65 28.02 ± 0.68 1.42
Sample III 37.76 ± 0.58 31.89 ± 0.67 29.56 ± 0.69 29.44 ± 0.76 1.25

APirimiphos methyl (mg kg−1) extracted from samples after sterilization in autoclave was determined at each fortification levels for correction of pesticide concentration level at the beginning of incubation (n = 3)

BControl wheat sample has no yeast addition, fermented wheat sample I, II and III were inoculated at levels 6, 8 and 10% (v/w) respectively

CPirimiphos methyl (mg kg−1) extracted from samples at day zero was determined as analytical recovery rates (n = 3)

DDegradation rate constant