Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 9;17:3. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0282-4

Table 1.

Effect estimates obtained from g-computation using the illustrative example dataseta (N = 7706)

G-computation (via Monte Carlo Simulation)b
Point Estimate Standard Error 95% Confidence Interval
Average Treatment Effect among the Treated (ATT)
 Risk difference −0.019 0.009 −0.040, −0.007
 Odds ratio 0.773 0.112 0.607, 0.944
Average Treatment Effect among the Untreated (ATU)
 Risk difference −0.012 0.012 −0.036, 0.010
 Odds ratio 0.910 0.133 0.678, 1.177
Average Treatment Effect (ATE)
 Risk difference −0.015 0.011 −0.036, 0.007
 Odds ratio 0.884 0.127 0.676, 1.130

aTreatment: education (1 = high school and beyond, 0 = less than high school); outcome: ever diagnosed with angina (1 = yes, 0 = no); covariates: age and gender

bThe outcome model included all possible 2- and 3-way product terms between education and covariates. Standard errors and the 95% confidence limits were based on 500 bootstrap samples where the standard deviation of the 500 point estimates was taken as the standard error and the corresponding 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles were taken as the lower and upper limit of the 95% confidence interval