Table 4. Wolbachia do not affect intraspecific mating defined as the proportion of mated females in 24 hr.

		N	Mean (%)	SD (%)	♀I × ♂I	♀U × ♂I	♀I × ♂U	♀U × ♂U
D. teissieri	♀I × ♂I	60	89.78	9.36		14.33	44.80	8.01
	♀U × ♂I	40	90.43	6.77	381.48		30.48	22.33
	♀I × ♂U	40	86.83	14.48	381.48	417.89		52.81
	♀U × ♂U	50	91.74	4.95	357.86	396.45	396.45
D. yakuba	♀I × ♂I	50	89.22	11.06		20.40	29.36	22.59
	♀U × ♂I	40	91.52	6.40	396.45		8.96	2.20
	♀I × ♂U	40	90.75	9.85	396.45	417.89		6.77
	♀U × ♂U	50	91.94	6.00	373.77	396.45	396.45
D. santomea	♀I × ♂I	50	88.70	8.68		8.50	2.03	10.69
	♀U × ♂I	40	88.80	7.90	396.45		10.53	2.19
	♀I × ♂U	40	89.65	6.30	396.45	417.89		12.71
	♀U × ♂U	40	88.83	7.65	396.45	417.89	417.89

N is the number of mass matings between sets of 100 females and 100 males that produced the mean (percentage of females mated) and SD. The last four columns show our statistical analyses as 4 × 4 matrices for each species. The upper triangular matrix shows the observed Kruskal-Wallis difference. The lower triangular matrix shows the critical value required to achieve significance at P < 0.05 after correcting for multiple comparisons. No pairwise comparison showed a statistically significant difference. Each replicate was composed of 100 females.