Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 7;205(1):333–351. doi: 10.1534/genetics.116.196238

Table 5. Wolbachia do not affect intraspecific fecundity defined as the number of eggs laid by females following an observed mating.

N Mean SD ♀I × ♂I ♀U × ♂I ♀I × ♂U ♀U × ♂U
D. teissieri ♀I × ♂I 44 71.14 11.41 52.09 35.58 57.91
♀U × ♂I 44 75.18 12.19 387.27 16.51 5.82
♀I × ♂U 44 73.30 9.99 387.27 387.27 22.33
♀U × ♂U 44 74.91 11.21 387.27 387.27 387.27
D. yakuba ♀I × ♂I 44 70.05 11.76 141.77 42.39 228.73
♀U × ♂I 44 79.55 15.39 387.27 99.39 86.95
♀I × ♂U 44 72.91 12.51 387.27 387.27 186.34
♀U × ♂U 44 84.14 8.75 387.27 387.27 387.27
D. santomea ♀I × ♂I 44 75.32 11.12 6.09 35.58 64.68
♀U × ♂I 44 76.38 12.22 367.40 41.67 58.59
♀I × ♂U 55 73.73 12.57 387.27 367.40 100.26
♀U × ♂U 44 80.05 14.16 387.27 367.40 387.27

N is the number of single-pair matings that produced the mean and SD. The last four columns show our statistical analyses as 4 × 4 matrices for each species. The upper triangular matrix shows the observed Kruskal-Wallis difference. The lower triangular matrix shows the critical value required to achieve significance at P < 0.05 after correcting for multiple comparisons. No pairwise comparison showed a statistically significant difference.