Table 2. Statistics showing different patterns in immune vs. control gene classes.
| Gene class | Population(s) | Statistic | Direction of immune vs. control statistica |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cellular | Neth-Ith | FST | Greater |
| Phagocytosis | Global | FST | Greater |
| Ith-Tas | FST | Greater | |
| Neth-Ith | FST | Greater | |
| Neth-Tas | FST | Greater | |
| Epithelial | Netherlands | H | Less |
| IMD | Zimbabwe | π | Greater |
| Toll | Zim-Neth | FST | Less |
| JAK-STAT | Tasmania | D | Less |
| Viral defense | Zim-Ith | FST | Greater |
| Zim-Tas | FST | Greater | |
| RNAi | Beijing | H | Less |
| Zimbabwe | H | Less | |
| Neth-Tas | FST | Greater | |
| Zim-Ith | FST | Greater | |
| Recognition | Beijing | π | Greater |
| Ithaca | π | Greater | |
| Netherlands | π | Greater | |
| Tasmania | π | Greater | |
| Zimbabwe | π | Greater | |
| Ith-Tas | FST | Greater | |
| Neth-Ith | FST | Greater | |
| Neth-Tas | FST | Greater | |
| Phagocytosis recognition receptors | Beijing | π | Greater |
| Ithaca | π | Greater | |
| Ith-Tas | FST | Greater | |
| Neth-Ith | FST | Greater | |
| Neth-Tas | FST | Greater | |
| Zim-Beij | FST | Greater | |
| Zim-Tas | FST | Greater | |
| Humoral recognition receptors | Beijing | π | Greater |
| Ithaca | π | Greater | |
| Netherlands | π | Greater | |
| Tasmania | π | Greater | |
| Zimbabwe | π | Greater | |
| Netherlands | D | Greater | |
| Beijing | H | Less | |
| Ithaca | H | Less | |
| Tasmania | H | Less | |
| Effectors | Tasmania | π | Greater |
| AMPs | Tasmania | π | Greater |
Neth, the Netherlands; Ith, Ithaca, NY; Tas, Tasmania; Zim, Zimbabwe; Beij, Beijing.
a
All statistics were corrected for multiple testing and were significant at an α of 0.05, as determined by permutation.