TABLE 3.
—Continued
| No. (%) of isolates
| |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Melbourne
|
Hobart
|
Adelaide
|
Perth
|
Darwin
|
|||||
| 2000 (n = 40) | 2002 (n = 39) | 2000 (n = 2) | 2002 (n = 6) | 2000 (n = 28) | 2002 (n = 36) | 2000 (n = 46) | 2002 (n = 55) | 2000 (n = 7) | 2002 (n = 21) |
| 3 (10.7) | 5 (13.9) | 3 (6.5) | 8 (14.5) | ||||||
| 2 (5.0) | 1 (2.6) | 2 (5.6) | 1 (1.8) | 5 (23.8) | |||||
| 1 (2.5) | 2 (5.1) | 2 (100) | 3 (50.0) | 5 (17.9) | 14 (38.9) | 27 (58.7) | 22 (40.0) | 3 (42.9) | 2 (9.5) |
| 1 (2.5) | 2 (33.3) | 1 (3.6) | 3 (8.3) | 1 (1.8) | |||||
| 1 (2.6) | 1 (3.6) | 1 (2.8) | 11 (23.9) | 13 (23.6) | |||||
| 2 (7.1) | 2 (5.6) | 11 (23.9) | 13 (23.6) | ||||||
| 2 (7.1) | 5 (9.1) | ||||||||
| 1 (3.6) | 1 (2.8) | 2 (4.3) | |||||||
| 2 (28.6) | 2 (9.5) | ||||||||
| 1 (1.8) | |||||||||
| 1 (2.6) | 2 (7.1) | 1 (2.8) | 1 (2.2) | 1 (14.3) | 1 (4.8) | ||||
| 4 (10.0) | 5 (12.8) | 2 (100) | 5 (83.3) | 17 (60.7) | 29 (80.6) | 44 (95.7) | 51 (92.7) | 6 (85.7) | 10 (47.6) |
| 22 (55.0) | 12 (30.8) | 1 (16.7) | 2 (7.1) | 8 (38.1) | |||||
| 8 (20.0) | 22 (56.4) | 8 (28.6) | 6 (16.7) | 3 (5.5) | 1 (14.3) | 3 (14.3) | |||
| 1 (2.2) | |||||||||
| 1 (1.8) | |||||||||
| 6 (15.0) | 1 (3.6) | 1 (2.8) | 1 (2.2) | ||||||
| 36 (90.0) | 34 (87.2) | 0 | 1 (16.7) | 11 (39.3) | 7 (19.4) | 2 (4.3) | 4 (7.3) | 1 (14.3) | 11 (52.4) |