Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Causes Control. 2016 Dec 10;28(1):23–39. doi: 10.1007/s10552-016-0833-3

Table 4.

Current and Lifetime Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) and Measures of Cancer-Related Quality of Life Indicators (Symptoms of Depression, Stress, FACIT-Sp and FACT-G and FACIT-SP): Mean Score (Standard Error) by IPV form (MANCOVA)

Mean Score (Standard Error) for Cancer-Related Quality of
Life (QOL) Indicator by IPV timing and form
IPV Timinga
Cancer QOL
Indicators
No IPV Past IPV Alone Current
IPV
MANCOVA Model
1c,d
(n=2057) (n=963) n=258
Depressive symptoms g 1.58 (0.06)REF 2.25 (0.07)f 2.72 (0.11)f,g
  By Age at Diagnosis
  <55 (n=1251) 1.77 (0.10)REF 2.59 (0.11)f 2.79 (0.16)f, g
  55–64 (n=1174) 1.56 (0.09)REF 2.10 (0.11)f 2.67 (0.18)f, g
  65+ (n=853) 1.24 (0.11)REF 1.76 (0.15)f 2.67 (0.25)f, g
Perceived Stress Scale h
  Within 2 month after diagnosis 4.16 (0.10)REF 5.09 (0.12)f 5.43 (0.20)f
  By Age at Diagnosis
  <55 (n=1251) 4.78 (0.18) REF 5.90 (0.19)f 6.02 (0.29)f
  55–64 (n=1174) 4.17 (0.17)REF 5.16 (0.20)f 5.56 (0.33)f
  65+ (n=853) 3.25 (0.21)REF 3.67 (0.28) 4.34 (0.48)f
Stress, in month before interview 3.09 (0.09)REF 3.77 (0.10)f 4.92 (0.16)f, g
  By Age at Diagnosis
  <55 (n=1251) 3.54 (0.15)REF 4.16 (0.16)f 5.23 (0.25)f, g
  55–64 (n=1174) 2.98 (0.15)REF 3.79 (0.17)f 4.64 (0.28)f, g
  65+ (n=853) 2.61 (0.17)REF 3.15 (0.23)f 5.03 (0.40)f, g
MANCOVA Model 2 i
-FACIT-Sp j 31.17 (0.17)REF 30.01 (0.21) 27.69 (0.33)f, g
  By Age at Diagnosis
  <55 (n=1251) 30.43 (0.30)REF 29.21 (0.30)f 27.14 (0.50)f, g
  55–64 (n=1174) 30.43 (0.30)REF 30.36 (0.34)f 28.14 (0.56)f, g
  65+ (n=853) 32.09 (0.32)REF 30.98 (0.44)f 27.78 (0.75)f, g
-FACT-G Total (Summed) Scalek 63.10 (0.40)REF 59.03 (0.47)f 53.94 (0.75)f, g
  By Age at Diagnosis
  <55 (n=1251) 61.46 (0.71)REF 57.07 (0.76)f 52.35 (1.16)f, g
  55–64 (n=1174) 63.09 (0.66)REF 59.22 (0.76)f 55.22 (1.25)f, g
  65+ (n=853) 65.58 (0.72)REF 61.48 (0.93)f 54.58 (1.67)f, g
MANCOVA Model 3 l by -FACT Subscalesm
  Physical Functioning 13.65 (0.15)REF 12.55 (0.18)f 11.81 (0.29)f, g
  Work/Life Functioning 17.9 (0.13)REF 16.02 (0.15)f 15.27 (0.25)f, g
  Emotional Functioning 13.97 (0.12)REF 13.07 (0.14)f 11.80 (0.23)f, g
  Social Functioning 18.39 (0.11)REF 17.39 (0.13)f 15.07 (0.21)f, g
MANCOVA Model 4o
-FACIT-Sp 31.33 (0.17)REF 30.01 (0.21)f 28.08 (0.35)f, g
-FACT-G Sum Scale 64.98 (0.40)REF 59.03 (0.47)f 56.17 (0.84)f, g
MANCOVA Model 5 p by FACT-G Subscales
  Physical Functioning 15.07 (0.16)REF 13.45 (0.19)f 13.25 (0.32)f
  Work/Life Functioning 17.40 (0.13)REF 16.12 (0.15)f 15.69 (0.27)f, g
  Emotional Functioning 13.85 (0.12)REF 12.27 (0.14)f 11.77 (0.26)f, g
  Social Functioning 18.66 (0.11) 17.05 (0.13)f 15.63 (0.23)f, g
Lifetime IPV by formb

Cancer QOL Indicators Any form Sexual Physical Psychological
MANCOVA Model 1c, d N=1221 N=346 N=802 N=1099
Depressive symptoms g 2.35 (0.06)f 2.58 (0.10)f 2.36 (0.07)f 2.39 (0.06)f
Perceived Stress Scale h
  Within 2 month after diagnosis 5.17 (0.11)f 5.39 (0.18)f 5.21 (0.13)f 5.23 (0.12)f
  In the month before interview 4.04 (0.10)f 4.34 (0.15)f 4.10 (0.11)f 4.11 (0.10)f
MANCOVA Model 2 i
-FACIT-Sp j 29.49 (0.19)f 29.16 (0.30)f 29.31 (0.22)f 29.34 (0.20)f
-FACT-G Total (Summed) Scale k 57.86 (0.43)f 55.89 (0.67)f 57.55 (0.48)f 57.46 (0.45)f
MANCOVA Model 3 l By FACT-G Subscales m
  Physical Functioning 12.38 (0.17)f 11.71 (0.26)f 12.23 (0.19)f 12.29 (0.17)f
  Work/Life Functioning 15.85 (0.14)f 15.36 (0.22)f 15.70 (0.16)f 15.75 (0.15)f
  Emotional Functioning 12.78 (0.13)f 12.44 (0.20)f 12.82 (0.15)f 12.67 (0.14)f
  Social Functioning 16.86 (0.12)f 16.37 (0.19)f 16.80 (0.14)f 16.73 (0.13)f
MANCOVA Model 4 o
-FACIT-Sp 29.70 (0.19)f 29.03 (0.32)f 29.47 (0.22)f 29.62 (0.20)f
-FACT-G Total Scale 59.59 (0.44)f 57.18 (0.75)f 59.18 (0.53)f 59.32 (0.46)f
MANCOVA Model 5p By FACT-G Subscales
  Physical Functioning 13.73 (0.17)f 13.03 (0.29)f 13.60 (0.20)f 13.62 (0.18)f
  Work/Life Functioning 16.16 (0.14)f 15.52 (0.24)f 15.98 (0.17)f 16.10 (0.15)f
  Emotional Functioning 12.61 (0.13)f 12.29 (0.23)f 12.64 (0.16)f 12.56 (0.14)f
  Social Functioning 17.09 (0.12)f 16.33 (0.21)f 16.95 (0.15)f 17.04 (0.13)f
a

IPV by a current partner comparisons made as follows: Any Current IPV form (sexual, physical, or psychological IPV) versus No Lifetime IPV and relative to Past IPV ‘alone’

b

Lifetime IPV by any partner comparisons made as follows: Any Lifetime IPV form (sexual, physical, or psychological IPV by a current) versus No Lifetime IPV; Sexual IPV versus No Lifetime IPV, Physical IPV versus No Lifetime IPV; Psychological IPV versus No Lifetime IPV

c

All MANCOVA models were adjusted for age (in years at diagnosis), family monthly income (1=<$1000, 2=$1000–1999, 3=$2000–$2999, 4=$3000–3999,5=$4000–4999, 6=≥$5000), cancer type (included in models as 1=cancers for which an early detection screening is widely available (i.e., breast, colorectal or cervical cancers) versus 0=all other cancer forms), current smoking status (1= current smoker, 0=current non-smoker), Cancer Registry State (1= North Carolina, 0= Kentucky), current marital status (1=currently married, 0=all other marital status), stage at diagnosis (1=localized, 2=regional, direct extension 3=regional, 4= metastasis), and number of comorbid physical health conditions, and number of days between cancer diagnosis and interview

d

MANCOVA model 1 includes the following three outcomes as dependent variables: symptoms of depression, perceived stress within 2 months after cancer diagnosis and stress in the prior month before phone interview.

e

Depression symptoms measured with an abbreviated version of the Brief Symptoms Inventory: 5 items, Cronbach’s ɑ =0.804, Range 0=5; Unadjusted Mean = 1.67)

f

compares mean scores with no IPV as referent group; statistically significant at p<.01

g

compares mean scores with past IPV as referent group; statistically significant at p<.01

h

Symptoms of stress measured with 3 items of the 4 item Perceive Stress Scale (PSS) asked for two time frames within 2 months following cancer diagnosis (Cronbach’s ɑ =0.673; Range 0=12; Unadjusted Mean = 4.51, and at in the month prior to the phone interview (Cronbach’s ɑ =0.653); Range 0–12; Unadjusted Mean =3.23)

i

MANCOVA model 2 includes the following two outcomes as dependent variables: FACT-G and FACIT-SP

j

Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-being (FACIT-Sp) Psychometrics: 12 items, Cronbach’s ɑ=0.816; Range 2–36; Unadjusted Mean=31.34.

k

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – General (FACT-G): four subscales were summed to create a total score Psychometrics: 27 items; Cronbach’s α=0.905, Range 10–81; Unadjusted Mean=64.00.

l

MANCOVA model 3 includes the following four FACT-G subscales as correlated dependent variables: physical, social/family, emotional, and work/life functioning

m

FACT-G subscales and psychometrics: physical functioning (7 items, Range 0–21; Mean=14.38; Cronbach’s ɑ=0.817), work/life functional status (7 items: Range 0–21; M=17.30, Cronbach’s α=.793), emotional functioning (6 items: Range 0–18; M=14.02, Cronbach’s α=.755), and social/family functioning (7 items: Range 0–21; M=18.28, Cronbach’s α=.763)

n

FACT- cognitive functioning included for a subsample of women (n=881 surveyed in 2008–2009) Psychometrics: 12 items, Range 0–12; Mean=10.18; Cronbach’s ɑ=0.915. This outcome alone was included in a ANOVA model.

o

MANCOVA Model 4 includes the following two outcomes as dependent variables: FACT-G and FACIT-SP and treatment received was included additionally included as a covariate (chemotherapy, radiation, surgery). This analysis was restricted to the 2380 women recruited from the Kentucky Cancer Registry because treatment data was available for these women.

p

MANCOVA Model 5 includes the following four FACT-G subscales (physical, work-life, emotional and social functioning). The model additionally adjusts for treatment received among the 2387 women recruited from the Kentucky Cancer Registry because treatment data was available for these women.