Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jan 10.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2008 Mar 12;294(5):C1242–C1249. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00529.2007

Table 1.

Cell cycle related gene expression after FGF-2 and/or FGF-16 treatment in neonatal cardiac myocytes

Genes Category FGF-2 FGF-16 FGF-2 + FGF-16
Ccnf (cyclin F) 6 2.80* 1.26 1.83
Mki67 (Ki67) 2 2.22* 1.28 1.49
Arf/INK4A 5/7 1.25 1.20 2.38*

Categories of functional gene grouping: 1, G1 phase and G1/S transition; 2, S phase and DNA replication; 3, G2 phase and G2/M transition; 4, M phase; 5, cell cycle checkpoint and cell cycle arrest; 6, regulation of the cell cycle; 7, negative regulation of cell cycle (www.superarray.com). Cultures of neonatal cardiomyocytes were treated with vehicle, FGF-2 (1 ng/ml), FGF-16 (100 ng/ml), or FGF-2 combined with FGF-16 for 24 h, followed by extraction of total RNA. Real-time RT-PCR was carried out on a 96-gene mini array. Data are mean fold change of mRNA expression in treatment group vs. control from 3 separate experiments. Gene expression level, expressed as inverse relationship to threshold cycle (Ct) and doubling of amount of product with every cycle, is calculated using the equation L = 2−Ct. After correction using housekeeping gene expression, relative expression level for each treatment group is given by [L(GOI)experiment/L(HKG)experiment]/[L(GOI)control/L(HKG)control], where L is gene expression level, GOI is gene of interest, and HKG is housekeeping gene average value. When calculated using L = 2−Ct, relative expression is equivalent to 2−ΔΔCt.

*

Numbers pass dual criteria where 1) gene expression level is >200% of control and 2) P < 0.01, when treatment is compared with control by repeated measures ANOVA and the Dunnett posttest for comparisons of multiple treatments to a common control.