Table 1.
Variable | Base value | Setting |
---|---|---|
Costs (2014 US$) | ||
Reminder letter | $1.4 | Norway(5) |
Primary office visita | $241 | Norwayf |
Analysing Pap smear | $45 | Norwayf |
Analysing hrHPV test | $40 | Norwayf |
Self-collection kitb | $54 | Norway(5) |
Colposcopy with biopsy | $532 | Norwayf |
Treatment of precancer | $1,681 | Norwayf |
Treatment of local cancer | $26,929 | Norwayf |
Treatment of regional cancer | $56,573 | Norwayf |
Treatment of distant cancer | $41,348 | Norwayf |
% screening at different frequencies with current 2-reminder letter policy | ||
3-yearly | 47% | Norway (16) |
4-yearly | 10% | Norway (16) |
5-yearly | 22% | Norway (16) |
8-yearly | 5% | Assumption |
10-yearly | 5% | Norway (16) |
20-yearly | 5% | Assumption |
Never | 6% | Norway (16) |
‘5-yearly self-sampling’ policy | ||
% returning SS device | 20% | Norway (5) |
% increase in absolute participation with SS | 10% | Norway (5) |
% switch from physician-collected to SSc | 10% | Norway (5) |
‘10-yearly self-sampling’ policy | ||
% returning SS device | 11% | Assumption |
% increase in absolute participation with SS | 6% | Assumption |
% switch from physician-collected to SSc | 5% | Assumption |
Additional base case self-sampling parameters | ||
% hrHPV-positive attending office-based cytology | 88% | Norway (5) |
% hrHPV-negative attending office-based cytologyd | 18% | Norway (5) |
% requesting SS device (opt-in policy) | 30% | Sweden (14) and Denmark (6) |
Test characteristicse | ||
Relative sensitivity of self-collected hrHPV test | 100% | Meta-analysis (2, 3) |
Relative specificity of self-collected hrHPV test | 95% | Meta-analysis (2, 3) |
hrHPV: high-risk human papillomavirus.
Includes patient time and transport, and sending sample to laboratory;
Includes self-collection device (dry brush), leaflet, resealable zipper bag, identification sheet, return envelope and postage. For the proportion of women that returned their device, we included individual's time (i.e. 45 minutes) to read the instructions, take the sample and return the sample to a mailbox;
Proportion of women that would have attended an office-based exam within the same year if self-sample device was not mailed;
Proportion of women that were hrHPV-negative on their self-collected sample, but attended an office-based cytology exam;
Self-collected cervico-vaginal sample relative to physician-collected cervical sample. HPV test sensitivity is defined as the probability of detecting high-risk HPV given presence of high-risk HPV in the cervical canal. HPV test specificity is defined as the probability of not detecting hrHPV given hrHPV is not present in the cervix;
Based on previous Norwegian analyses (10) and updated to 2014 values.
For more detailed information on cost calculations, please visit the author’s website at: http://www.med.uio.no/helsam/english/research/projects/preventive-strategies-hpv/harvardmodel-norway-technicalappendix.pdf. (US $1=NOK6.30)