Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016 Sep 13;26(1):95–103. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0350

Table 1.

Selected model inputs and assumptions

Variable Base value Setting
Costs (2014 US$)
Reminder letter $1.4 Norway(5)
Primary office visita $241 Norwayf
Analysing Pap smear $45 Norwayf
Analysing hrHPV test $40 Norwayf
Self-collection kitb $54 Norway(5)
Colposcopy with biopsy $532 Norwayf
Treatment of precancer $1,681 Norwayf
Treatment of local cancer $26,929 Norwayf
Treatment of regional cancer $56,573 Norwayf
Treatment of distant cancer $41,348 Norwayf

% screening at different frequencies with current 2-reminder letter policy
3-yearly 47% Norway (16)
4-yearly 10% Norway (16)
5-yearly 22% Norway (16)
8-yearly 5% Assumption
10-yearly 5% Norway (16)
20-yearly 5% Assumption
Never 6% Norway (16)

‘5-yearly self-sampling’ policy
% returning SS device 20% Norway (5)
% increase in absolute participation with SS 10% Norway (5)
% switch from physician-collected to SSc 10% Norway (5)

‘10-yearly self-sampling’ policy
% returning SS device 11% Assumption
% increase in absolute participation with SS 6% Assumption
% switch from physician-collected to SSc 5% Assumption

Additional base case self-sampling parameters
% hrHPV-positive attending office-based cytology 88% Norway (5)
% hrHPV-negative attending office-based cytologyd 18% Norway (5)
% requesting SS device (opt-in policy) 30% Sweden (14) and
Denmark (6)

Test characteristicse
Relative sensitivity of self-collected hrHPV test 100% Meta-analysis (2, 3)
Relative specificity of self-collected hrHPV test 95% Meta-analysis (2, 3)

hrHPV: high-risk human papillomavirus.

a

Includes patient time and transport, and sending sample to laboratory;

b

Includes self-collection device (dry brush), leaflet, resealable zipper bag, identification sheet, return envelope and postage. For the proportion of women that returned their device, we included individual's time (i.e. 45 minutes) to read the instructions, take the sample and return the sample to a mailbox;

c

Proportion of women that would have attended an office-based exam within the same year if self-sample device was not mailed;

d

Proportion of women that were hrHPV-negative on their self-collected sample, but attended an office-based cytology exam;

e

Self-collected cervico-vaginal sample relative to physician-collected cervical sample. HPV test sensitivity is defined as the probability of detecting high-risk HPV given presence of high-risk HPV in the cervical canal. HPV test specificity is defined as the probability of not detecting hrHPV given hrHPV is not present in the cervix;

f

Based on previous Norwegian analyses (10) and updated to 2014 values.

For more detailed information on cost calculations, please visit the author’s website at: http://www.med.uio.no/helsam/english/research/projects/preventive-strategies-hpv/harvardmodel-norway-technicalappendix.pdf. (US $1=NOK6.30)