Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jan 16.
Published in final edited form as: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2016 Dec 21;56(3):851–855. doi: 10.1002/anie.201609844

Table 1.

Reaction optimization.

graphic file with name nihms-840122-t0007.jpg

Entry (E)/(Z) Copper
catalyst
Solvent Yield [%][a] d.r.[b] e.r.[c]
1 (E) 4 THF 45 15:1 70:30
2 (E) 5 THF 32 5:1 82:18
3 (E) 6 THF 32 9:1 43:57
4 (Z) 4 THF 46 11:1 91:9
5 (Z) 5 THF <5
6 (Z) 6 THF <5
7 (Z) 4 toluene 68 8:1 90:10
8 (Z) 4 toluene:THF
(10:1)
78 15:1 94:6
9 (Z) 4 toluene:Et20
(10:1)
26 6:1 86:14
10 (Z) 4 toluene:DMF
(10:1)
58 16:1 95:5
11 (Z) 4 toluene:MeCN
(10:1)
83 50:1 96:4
graphic file with name nihms-840122-t0008.jpg
[a]

Yield was determined by gas chromatography (GC) analysis with a calibrated internal standard.

[b]

Diastereomeric ratio (d.r.) was determined by GC analysis of the unpurified reaction mixture.

[c]

Determined by HPLC (with a chiral column) of the purified products. Solvent key: tetrahydrofuran (THF); diethyl ether (Et2O); N,N,-dimethylformamide (DMF); acetonitrile (MeCN).