Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Feb 3.
Published in final edited form as: Int J STD AIDS. 2015;26(8):542–548. doi: 10.1177/0956462414545794

Table III.

Multivariate unconditional logistic regression predicting non-use of condoms during the last intercourse with a non client (n=303).

Did not use condom during the last sex with non commercial partner/total (%) Crude odds ratios (95.CI) Adj. odds ratios (95.CI) p adj.
History of abortion
Yes 93/199 (46.7) 1.15 (0.71–1.85) 3.78 (1.72–8.30) 0.001
No 45/104 (43.3) 1 1
No response 5/28 (17.9) 0.28 (0.10–0.81) 1.43 (0.35–5.82) 0.617
Perceived risk towards HIV
Does not feel being at risk 33/148 (22.3) 1 1
Feels being at risk 85/177 (48.0) 3.22 (1.98–5.24) 3.67 (1.67–8.07) 0.001
Does not know/no response 34/49 (69.4) 7.90 (3.84–16.23) 12.84 (4.64–35.46) 0.000
Would reveal a positive result of HIV test to intimate partner
Yes 110/213 (51.6) 4.81 (2.77–8.33) 3.48 (1.45–8.32) 0.005
No 18/93 (19.3) 1 1
Does not know/no response 17/32 (53.1) 4.89 (2.12–11.28) 2.80 (0.83–9.43) 0.096
Confortable asking intimate partner to use condom
Yes 73/287 (25.4) 1 1
No 58/64 (90.6) 28.34 (11.74–68.42) 53.04 (13.97–201.33) 0.000
Does not know/no response 21/23 (91.3) 30.78 (7.04–134.48) 53.03 (7.59–370.50) 0.000
Dominican nationality
Yes 85/136 (62.5) 4.25 (2.71–6.65) 3.79 (1.73–8.29) 0.001
No 67/238 (28.1) 1 1
Lives in a couple
Yes 42/77 (54.5) 1.98 (1.19–3.31) 2.46 (1.07–5.66) 0.033
No 101/268 (37.7) 1 1
No response 9/29 (31.0) 0.74 (0.33–1.70) 1.15 (0.29–4.54) 0.838
Score of certain knowledge (out of 20)
Below 17* 99/209 (47.4) 1 1
Greater than 17 53/165 (32.1) 0.53 (0.34–0.80) 0.84 (0.41–1.72) 0.631
Social vulnerability score (out of 5)
Below 2** 109/246 (44.3) 1 1
Greater than 2 43/128 (33.6) 0.64 (0.41–0.99) 0.75 (0.36–1.55) 0.438
*

17 is the median value

**

2 is the median value