Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 11;7:40528. doi: 10.1038/srep40528

Table 1. Mice used in pre- and post-treatment experiments.

Numbers of adult CD1 mice
Pre-treatment Post-treatment
Groups IHC WB Groups IHC/FJC WB EB EEG
Vehicle 12 8 Pilocarpine 24 45 39 29
IVIg 13 7 SE mice 16 19 20 18
Vehicle SE 7 5 Vehicle 8 9 11 5
(21.8 ± 1.6) (21.6 ± 2.2) (20.6 ± 1.8) (21.5 ± 2.8)
IVIg SE 4 4 IVIg 8 10 9 7
(21.0 ± 2.5) (20.7 ± 1.3) (21.9 ± 3.4) (24.2 ± 3.1)

In pre-treatment experiments, mice were randomly allocated to receive vehicle or IVIg before administration of pilocarpine. Animals developing SE were used for immunohistochemistry (IHC), Fluoro Jade C staining (FJC) and western blotting (WB) studies, as shown in the bottom two rows.

In post-treatment experiments, mice developing SE were randomly allocated to receive vehicle or IVIg. The number of animals receiving pilocarpine (Post-treatment, Row 1), the number developing SE (Row 2) are shown. The number of animals receiving vehicle or IVIg used for IHC, WB, Evans blue staining (EB) and electroencephalography (EEG) are shown in Rows 3 and 4. The numbers in brackets are the seizure scores of each group (modified Racine scale, mean ± standard error of the mean, no significant difference between SE vehicle and SE IVIg groups, unpaired t-test). Fewer animals underwent EEG recording than were randomised due to the death of 3 vehicle-treated and 3 IVIg-treated animals before EEG recording.