Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 11;10:22. doi: 10.1186/s13071-016-1933-3

Table 3.

Parity rates of Anopheles vectors of malaria in the three study health districts

Health district An. gambiae (s.l.) An. funestus An. pharoensis An. paludis An. rufipes
Garoua No. dissected (No. parous) 2,119 (765) 449 (177) 276 (68) 69 (18) 80 (25)
Parous rate (%) (95% CI) 36.10 (34.08–38.17) 39.42 (35.01–44.01) 24.64 (19.93–30.05) 26.09 (17.19–37.51) 31.25 (22.15–42.07)
Pitoa No. dissected (No. parous) 3,856 (2,207) 367 (132) 342 (124) 172 (49) 178 (84)
Parous rate (%) (95% CI) 57.24 (55.67–58.79) 35.97 (31.23–41.00) 36.26 (31.34–41.48) 28.49 (22.27–35.65) 47.19 (39.99–54.51)
Mayo Oulo No. dissected (No. parous) 1,184 (387) 136 (52) 60 (19) 12 (3) 925 (328)
Parous rate (%) (95% CI) 32.69 (30.07–35.41) 38.24 (30.50–46.62) 31.67 (21.31–44.23) 25.00 (8.89–53.23) 35.46 (32.44–38.60)
Total No. dissected (No. parous) 7,159 (3,359) 952 (361) 678 (211) 253 (70) 1,183 (437)
Parous rate (%) (95% CI) 46.92 (45.77–48.08) 37.92 (34.89–41.04) 31.12 (27.75–34.70) 27.67 (22.52–33.48) 36.94 (34.24–39.73)

Note: The difference in parity rate between health districts and anopheline species was not significant (χ 2 = 6.62, df = 8, P = 0.58)

Abbreviation: CI confidence interval