Table 3.
Single Motherhood as a Predictor of Negative Control
| |||||||
Predictor | B | SE | t | Predictor | B | SE | t |
| |||||||
Single Motherhood | 1.14 | 0.55 | 2.05* | Single Motherhood | 1.14 | 0.55 | 2.05* |
Low SES | 1.69 | 0.57 | 2.99** | Low SES | 1.69 | 0.57 | 2.99** |
Race (Caucasian) | −1.35 | 0.56 | −2.42* | Race (Caucasian) | −1.35 | 0.56 | −2.42* |
| |||||||
Model R2 = .10, F = 7.65, p < .001 | Model R2 = .10, F = 7.65, p < .001 | ||||||
Negative Control as a Predictor of Depressive Symptoms | Negative Control as a Predictor of Externalizing Disorders | ||||||
| |||||||
Predictor | B | SE | t | Predictor | B | SE | z |
| |||||||
Single Motherhood | 1.83 | 0.70 | 2.63** | Single Motherhood | 0.95 | 0.31 | 3.05** |
Negative Control | 0.17 | 0.07 | 2.53** | Negative Control | 0.08 | 0.03 | 2.61** |
CLES (Total) | 0.18 | .06 | 2.72** | CLES (Total) | 0.10 | 0.03 | 3.52*** |
Gender (Female) | 1.48 | 0.63 | 2.34* | ||||
| |||||||
Model R2 = .09, F = 5.65, p < .001 | −2 Log Likelihood = 308.92, Model LL = 50.33, R2Nagelkerke = .21 | ||||||
Indirect Effect via Negative Control | Indirect Effect via Negative Control | ||||||
| |||||||
Effect | SE | CI (lower) | CI (upper) | Effect | SE | CI (lower) | CI (upper) |
| |||||||
0.19 | 0.13 | 0.03 | 0.58 | 0.09 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.26 |
p < .05
p < .01
p < .001
Note. N = 385 for all analyses. Negative Control and Involvement were entered concurrently when predicting to Externalizing Disorders. CLES = Children’s Life Event Scale; SES = socioeconomic status. Dxs = Diagnoses; Sxs = Symptoms. All models control for baseline psychopathology, race, socioeconomic status, youth gender, and childhood stressful life events. Covariates that explain a significant portion of the variance are presented with predictor variables.