Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jan 11.
Published in final edited form as: J Bioinform Comput Biol. 2016 Sep 9;14(6):1650032. doi: 10.1142/S0219720016500323

Table 3.

The overall mean F1 score for each of pairwise peak alignment results using the one-way approach.

M z N F1 score N F1 score N F1 score
Homogeneous Heterogeneous Mice
NR No 54450 0.8860 (0.0002) 48400 0.0088 (0.0001) 12100 0.3522 (0.0004)
NR Yes 54450 0.6525 (0.0004) 48400 0.5740 (0.0005) 12100 0.1690 (0.0007)
R No 450 0.7288 (0.0102) 400 0.0121 (0.0010) 100 0.1635 (0.0173)
R Yes 450 0.6521 (0.0043) 400 0.4970 (0.0047) 100 0.1504 (0.0080)

Note: ‘M’ stands for ‘Method’; ‘NR’ and ‘R’ represent the nonrigid and rigid transformations, respectively; ‘z’ stands for the z-score standardization; ‘N’ is the total number of pairs considered; The numbers in parentheses represent the standard error.