Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jan 12.
Published in final edited form as: Stat Methods Med Res. 2014 May 28;24(1):141–174. doi: 10.1177/0962280214537394

Table 5.

Estimates of the median or common RC θ, with 95% confidence intervals, for the FDG-PET test–retest data from de Langen et al.,10 using various meta-analysis techniques.

Method θ̂ (95% CI for θ)
Fixed-effects with normal approximation 0.79 (0.67, 0.92)
Fixed-effects with exact likelihood 1.53 (1.32, 1.74)
Random-effects: DerSimonian and Laird 1.25 (0.67, 1.84)
Random-effects: REML 1.25 (0.68, 1.82)
Random-effects: EM algorithm, normal approximation 1.25 (0.52, 2.03)
Random-effects: EM algorithm, exact likelihood 1.34 (0.52, 1.97)