Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 29;2016:6740956. doi: 10.1155/2016/6740956

Table 5.

Comparisons of the p values computed using paired t-tests on average accuracies between the fused multiple-ROI texture and morphological analyses and the (a) conventional classification approach using texture features, (b) conventional classification approach using morphological features, (c) conventional classification approach using both texture and morphological features, and (d) multiple-ROI texture analysis.

(a) (b) (c) (d)
p value 0.007 0.011 0.041 0.046