Skip to main content
. 2004 Sep 14;1:8. doi: 10.1186/1742-4682-1-8

Table 2.

Comparison of computed and estimated coefficients

Computed coefficients Estimated coefficients
a10 0 0.0000
a11 -14.6780 -14.3647
a12 0 -0.1466
a13 7.3390 7.3414
a14 0 -0.2165
a15 -7.3390 -7.1723
a20 0 0.0000
a21 14.6780 14.6119
a22 -14.6780 -14.6540
a23 0 -0.0009
a24 0 0.0494
a25 0 -0.0309
a30 0 0.0000
a31 0 -2.3527
a32 0 1.3989
a33 -27.2517 -27.9204
a34 0 1.7491
a35 0 -0.9955
a40 0 0.0000
a41 0 2.0843
a42 0 -1.0925
a43 18.5664 19.0295
a44 -18.5664 -20.2112
a45 -9.2832 -8.3594
a50 0 0.0000
a51 0 -0.4026
a52 0 0.1384
a53 0 -0.0059
a54 18.5664 18.8987
a55 -18.5664 -18.7852

Regression coefficients for the small gene network (Figure 1), linearized about the steady state and based on relative deviations (option II). The first and second columns contain the computed and estimated regression coefficients, respectively. The regression coefficients aij refer to the influence of variable j on variable i, while ai0 is the constant term in each regression model. As the table indicates, the correspondence is good, except for the coefficients relating to X3 and X4 (see Text for explanation). The dataset consisted of 401 data points in the interval [0,4] and resulted from a simulation in which X3 was perturbed at t = 0 to a value 5% above its steady-state value.