Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 12;7:38600. doi: 10.1038/srep38600

Table 3. Monte-Carlo simulation study of full model approach.

Chr_SNP_Alleles Effect Parameter Estimate SE Power (%)
1_rs629301_T/G a 4.94 5.80 0.80 100
ae4 1.75 1.90 0.29 15
1_rs2499595_G/A a 1.86 1.96 0.52 44
ae1 1.36 1.90 0.38 23
ae2 −3.73 −3.20 0.57 37
ae4 1.94 2.43 0.51 20
2_rs478442_A/C a 5.73 5.19 0.53 81
ae1 −2.37 −0.46 2.93 7
de1 −3.85 0.58 3.82 14
de3 −2.91 −3.83 2.04 42
de4 5.40 3.84 1.88 27
3_rs7624679_C/T a 1.47 2.31 0.40 9
de4 −1.81 −3.54 1.97 2
4_rs7694118_C/T d 3.11 2.56 1.38 50
de1 8.31 6.38 1.61 51
de3 −6.08 −3.81 1.94 51
5_rs17409624_G/A a 2.14 2.31 0.47 78
ae3 3.14 2.99 0.85 71
ae4 −3.00 −2.95 0.73 69
7_rs6465748_G/A a −3.11 −2.85 2.15 37
d 2.14 4.41 1.58 29
ae1 1.55 1.26 1.72 20
ae3 −4.67 −5.92 2.43 35
ae4 4.33 4.51 1.75 34
8_rs10503377_C/T a 3.16 3.16 0.75 73
ae1 −2.12 −2.29 0.68 61
ae2 4.74 4.41 1.32 69
ae4 −2.30 −2.59 0.57 44
11_rs10768634_T/C a −1.15 0.72 1.05 21
d −3.45 −3.93 0.82 55
11_rs7124873_G/A a 2.57 2.97 0.42 76
14_rs10483461_C/T a 2.35 2.86 2.03 67
d −2.73 −4.50 1.68 60
ae3 4.02 2.96 1.08 23
ae4 −1.47 −2.23 1.28 16
15_rs12595211_G/A a −2.52 −2.98 0.58 51
de4 1.94 2.45 0.63 15
16_rs1532625_G/A a −2.85 −3.19 0.65 79
16_rs4888652_T/C a 1.91 2.43 0.46 46
17_rs2649485_C/T a −2.58 −2.84 0.39 64
18_rs9946067_T/C a −2.23 −1.63 0.46 36
d 2.89 2.70 0.77 39
19_rs1654452_C/T a −2.02 −2.29 0.53 70
d 1.62 2.00 0.64 64
2_rs478442_A/C  ×  aa 2.38 2.83 0.69 12
4_rs7694118_C/T ad −2.60 −4.14 1.69 10
da 3.59 −4.14 1.69 11
16_rs4888652_T/C  ×  da 2.64 −0.58 1.74 10
18_rs9946067_T/C dd −1.95 −3.52 0.95 8
7_rs2264802_C/A  ×  aa −4.71 −4.21 0.85 10
13_rs9548318_G/A ad −6.14 −6.45 0.75 8
10_rs12246594_A/T× aa 7.46 6.86 1.08 12
15_rs12595211_G/A

Results of Monte-Carlo simulations under scenario-I. Chr_SNP_Alleles: chromosome_QTS_major/minor alleles; Effect: mode of gene action; Parameter: true genetic effect; Estimate: average estimated effect of genetic parameters; Power (%): power of detecting effects in percentage.