Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 25;28(1):23–35. doi: 10.1177/0956797616671712

Table 1.

Results of the First-Difference Fixed-Effects Model Predicting Individual-Level Changes in Usage of Mobile Apps From the Week Before to the Week After the Earthquake (N = 45,574)

Communications apps (adjusted R2 = .139)
Hedonic apps (adjusted R2 = .0366)
Functional apps (adjusted R2 = .0253)
Predictor Coefficient SD t p Coefficient SD t p Coefficient SD t p
Change in outgoing-call frequency 0.835 0.085 9.79 < .001 0.262 0.058 4.53 < .001 0.227 0.096 2.37 .018
Change in outgoing-text frequency 0.739 0.040 18.6 < .001 0.309 0.027 11.4 < .001 0.271 0.045 6.05 < .001
Change in activated social-network size 0.635 0.248 2.56 .011 0.395 0.170 2.34 .019 0.973 0.278 3.49 < .001
Change in Web-usage frequency 1.27 0.020 62.8 < .001 0.207 0.014 15.0 < .001 0.542 0.023 23.9 < .001
Infrastructure-damage dummy –26.6 6.80 –3.91 < .001 –21.0 4.62 –4.53 < .001 –11.3 7.62 –1.49 .137
Earthquake intensity 5.21 0.166 31.5 < .001 2.92 0.113 26.0 < .001 2.61 0.186 14.1 < .001

Note: The dependent variables were changes in frequency of communications-, hedonic-, and functional-app usage between the week before and the week after the earthquake. F tests and Hausman tests for the three models were all highly significant ( ps < .001), which suggested that fixed-effects models were appropriate.