Table 1.
Major Studies Published from 2011–2015 regarding the ACS-AF relationship
| Authors, Year | Study Name/Study Design | Years Studied/Follow Up (Yrs) | Study Population | Major Findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Predicting Occurrence of ACS in AF | ||||
| Chao et al., 2015 [9] | N/A Registry |
2000–2011 5.7±3.6 |
12 114 AF pts with CHA2DS2-VASc scores of 0 (men) or 1 (women) | AF predicted MI compared to matched controls (HR 2.93 [95% CI 2.21–3.87]). MI risk was higher in men (HR 2.24 [95% CI 1.61–3.11]) after adjustment. |
| Soliman et al., 2015 [19] | ARIC Prospective | 1987–2010 Median 21.6 |
14 462 participants free of CHD at baseline | AF predicted MI compared to non-AF (HR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.32–2.02), NSTEMI (HR, 1.80; 95% CI 1.39–2.31) but not STEMI (HR 0.49; 95% CI 0.18–1.34). The association was stronger in women. |
| Soliman et al., 2014 [8] | REGARDS Prospective | 2003–2009 Median 4.5 |
23 928 participants free of CHD at baseline | MI rates in AF patients were higher than non-AF patients (adjusted HR 1.70 [95% CI, 1.26–2.3]). Women and blacks were at greater risk. Older age did not increase risk. |
| O’Neal, et al., 2014 [30] | CHS Prospective | 1989–2008 Median 12 |
4608 pts with no evidence of CHD | Presence of AF increased risk of MI (adj. HR: 1.7, 95% CI: 1.4–2.2). Blacks had increased risk compared with whites. |
| Predicting Occurrence of AF in ACS | ||||
| Bretler, et al., 2012[61] | 1997–2009 | 32 925 women discharged after MI with no known AF | HRT use decreased risk of new-onset AF in women with prior MI (HR 0.82, [95% CI 0.68–1.00]). Greatest decrease in women ≥ 80 y.o. | |
| Carrero, et al, 2014[74] | SWEDE HEART | 2003 – 2010 | 24 317 MI pts with AF | Warfarin treatment decreased the risk of re-infarction in those with eGFR > 60 and ≤ 15. |
| Prognostic Effect of AF in ACS | ||||
| Rene et al., 2014[51] | HORIZON-AMI RCT |
2007–2013 | 3 281 pts with sinus rhythm undergoing PCI | New-onset AF after PCI was an independent predictor of adverse clinical events (HR 1.74, 95% CI 1.30 to 2.34) and major adverse cardiac events (HR 1.73, 95% CI 1.27 to 2.36) at 3 years. |
| Verdecchia et al., 2014[36] | RE-LY RCT |
2005–2009 Median 2.0 |
10,372 anti-coagulated elderly AF pts | LVH presence increased CV death (HR 2.56, 95% CI 2.14 to 3.06) and MI in elderly AF patients (HR 2.07, 95% CI 1.47 to 2.92). |
| McManus et al., 2012 [27] | GRACE | 2000–2007 | 59,032 pts hospitalized with an ACS | Patients with AF were less likely than patients without AF to receive evidence-based therapies. Hospital death rates in patients with new-onset and pre-existing AF were 14.5% and 8.9%, compared to 1.2% in those without AF |
| Almedro-Delia, et al. 2014 [28] | ARIAM Registry | 2001–2011 | 39 237 consecutive pts with ACS | New-onset AF is an independent predictor for in-hospital mortality (HR 1.62, 95% CI 1.09–2.89). |
| Jabre 2011 [42] | Meta-Analysis | 1970–2009 | 43 studies involving 278,854 subjects | AF increases mortality in pts with acute MI, regardless of its onset being prior to MI (OR 1.28 [95%CI 1.26–1.49]) or after MI (OR 1.46 [95% CI 1.35–1.58]) |
| Angeli et al, 2012 [46] | Meta-Analysis | 1967–2010 | 24 studies involving 235,511 subjects | Mortality was higher in pts with AF (OR 2.00, 95 % CI: 1.93–2.08; P<0.0001). In NAF (OR 3.38 [95% CI 2.98–3.83] and permanent AF (OR 2.01 [95% CI 1.70–2.38]). |
| Ruff et al., 2014 [84] | REACH Registry Prospective | 2003–2009 4 |
44,518 of 68,236 enrolled in REACH | The prevalence of AF at baseline = 10.3% (n = 4582). Pts with AF had a 2-fold increase in the composite of CV death, MI, or stroke compared with patients without AF after adjustment (18.9%vs. 9.4%, p < 0.0001). Only 52% of patients with a history of AF at baseline were receiving anticoagulation at 4 years. |
AF atrial fibrillation, ACS Acute Coronary Syndrome, NAF new onset AF, Pts patients, MI myocardial infarction, HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval CHD coronary heart disease, CV cerebrovascular, SR sinus rhythm, STEMI ST segment elevation MI, NSTEMI non-ST segment elevation MI, PCI percutaneous coronary intervention, HRT hormone replacement therapy, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate