Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jan 12.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Med. 2008 Apr;59(4):939–945. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21507

Table 1.

Noise reduction performance, indicated by the observed changes when using the proposed method compared to (otherwise identical) regression analysis without the noise-estimate regressor.

Volunteer t-score change [%] amplitude change [%] residue variance change [%] number of active voxels change [%] number of active voxels change number of voxels in RAct number of voxels in RRef
1 14.1 (0.3) −0.06 (0.00) −12.1 (0.2) 16.7 304 1819 440
2 9.4 (0.3) −0.03 (0.00) −7.3 (0.2) 10.0 201 2005 960
3 12.3 (0.4) −0.13 (0.01) −10.2 (0.3) 57.7 390 676 963
4 14.7 (0.5) −0.03 (0.00) −11.2 (0.3) 29.5 388 1314 2008
5 6.0 (0.2) −0.33 (0.01) −4.8 (0.1) 7.2 195 2726 103
Mean 11.3 (1.6) −0.11 (0.1) −9.1 (1.4) 24.2 (9.2) 296 (43) 1708 (343) 895 (323)
Mean (threshold=0.4) 11.0 (1.7) −0.12 (0.1) −9.1 (1.5) 24.3 (9.0) 301 (39) 1710 (343) 1987 (581)
Mean (threshold=0.6) 12.2 (1.2) −0.13 (0.1) −9.3 (1.1) 24.7 (8.9) 309 (39) 1706 (344) 327 (154)
Mean (30 s ref. data) 11.0 (2.5) −0.09 (0.0) −9.1 (2.0) 22.3 (5.3) 322 (49) 1708 (343) 1135 (384)
Mean (270 s ref. data) 10.9 (1.5) −0.07 (0.0) −8.8 (1.5) 23.4 (5.8) 337 (56) 1710 (342) 1632 (666)

Values were obtained using a voxel selection threshold for the reference region of 0.5 and 120 s worth of reference data, unless otherwise noted (lower four rows). Values between parentheses are standard errors.