Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jan 13.
Published in final edited form as: Nanoscale. 2016 Apr 28;8(17):9390–9397. doi: 10.1039/c6nr01136e

Table 1.

Precision assay of the proposed fluorescent ELISA

Sample
matrix
OTA added
(µg kg−1)
OTA recovered
(µg kg−1)
Recovery
(%)
CV
(%)
Intra-assay (n = 3)a
Wheat 4 3.92 ± 0.29 98.00 7.44
10 10.22 ± 1.81 102.20 17.67
20 18.75 ± 1.05 93.75 5.58
40 40.54 ± 3.07 101.35 7.58
Corn 4 4.09 ± 0.63 102.25 15.35
10 10.23 ± 0.85 102.30 8.30
20 19.26 ± 3.00 96.30 15.58
40 37.50 ± 2.70 93.75 7.21
Rice 4 3.48 ± 0.27 87.00 7.70
10 9.12 ± 1.20 91.20 13.12
20 17.72 ± 0.88 88.60 4.96
40 34.51 ± 2.55 86.28 7.40
Inter-assay (n = 6)b
Wheat 4 4.11 ± 0.43 102.75 10.49
10 9.56 ± 1.48 95.60 15.53
20 18.94 ± 1.08 94.70 5.69
40 41.09 ± 2.72 102.73 6.61
Corn 4 4.19 ± 0.43 104.75 10.32
10 9.79 ± 1.06 97.90 10.86
20 19.21 ± 2.23 96.05 11.58
40 38.83 ± 2.45 97.08 6.30
Rice 4 3.89 ± 0.71 97.25 18.36
10 9.09 ± 0.92 90.90 10.09
20 18.62 ± 1.77 93.10 9.51
40 36.57 ± 3.37 91.43 9.21
a

The assay was performed in three replicates on the same day.

b

The assays were carried out on six consecutive days.