Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 13;7:40671. doi: 10.1038/srep40671

Table 3. Self-report incident diabetes at follow-up in relation to hazard ratio (HR) of total knee replacement (TKR) (n = 47,869).

  N Cases Person-years Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
HR (95% CI) HR (95% CI) HR (95% CI)
Total at follow-up
 No diabetes 44,434 1,276 434,427 1.00 1.00 1.00
 Incident diabetes 3,435 89 31,713 0.94 (0.76–1.17) 0.74 (0.59–0.92) 0.75 (0.60–0.93)
Men at follow-up
 No diabetes 18,996 223 181,104 1.00 1.00 1.00
 Incident diabetes 1,545 18 14,016 1.06 (0.65–1.71) 0.80 (0.49–1.30) 0.83 (0.51–1.34)
Women at follow-up
 No diabetes 25,438 1,053 253,323 1.00 1.00 1.00
 Incident diabetes 1,890 71 17,698 0.91 (0.72–1.16) 0.72 (0.57–0.92) 0.74 (0.58–0.94)

HRs were adjusted for the following variables in separate models:

Model 1: age at follow-up (years); year of recruitment (1993–1995, 1995–1998); dialect group (Hokkien, Cantonese), level of education (no formal education, primary school, secondary school or higher).

Model 2: above adding BMI at follow-up (model 2).

Model 3: model 2 adding self-reported histories of physician-diagnosed coronary heart disease or stroke at follow-up, smoking status at follow-up (never, former, or current), numbers of hours per week spent in moderate physical activity, vigorous work, and strenuous sports.