Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 3;14:1. doi: 10.1186/s12970-016-0158-3

Table 5.

Stroop Word-Color Cognitive Function Data

Variable Group Number Time (wk) p-value
0 4 8
Word (counts) PLA 27 109.8 ± 16.9 113.6 ± 17.2 116.2 ± 17.5 Group 0.33
PWS 27 107.7 ± 11.4 110.6 ± 10.9 115.3 ± 10.9 Time <0.001
PWS + S 26 102.3 ± 11.2 108.2 ± 17.0 112.4 ± 16.1 G x T 0.45
Mean ± SD 106.7 ± 13.7 110.8 ± 15.3* 114.7 ± 15.0*^
Color (counts) PLA 27 80.8 ± 10.6c 83.2 ± 11.8c 85.7 ± 12.5*c Group 0.35
PWS 27 78.2 ± 9.4 83.6 ± 9.6*c 86.7 ± 10.1*^c Time <0.001
PWS + S 26 77.0 ± 10.4a 79.7 ± 9.8*ab 82.1 ± 10.8*ab G x T 0.087l
Mean ± SD 78.7 ± 10.1 82.2 ± 10.5* 84.9 ± 11.2*^
Word-Color (counts) PLA 27 54.1 ± 11.5c 55.5 ± 11.5 58.5 ± 12.6*c Group 0.42
PWS 27 53.1 ± 5.9c 56.7 ± 7.4* 59.1 ± 7.6*c Time <0.001
PWS + S 26 49.2 ± 11.1ab 55.0 ± 9.6* 55.6 ± 10.2*ab G x T 0.04q

Values are means ± standard deviations. Word, Color, and Word-Color counts were analyzed by MANOVA. MANOVA analysis revealed overall Wilks’ Lambda group (p = 0.83), time (p < 0.001), and group x time (p = 0.17). Greenhouse-Geisser time and group x time (G x T) interaction p-values are reported with univariate group p-values. q represents quadratic effect and l represents linear p-value from univariate ANOVA. * represents p < 0.05 difference from baseline. ^ represents p < 0.05 difference from wk 4. arepresents p < 0.05 from PLA. brepresents p < 0.05 from PWS. crepresents p < 0.05 from PWS + S