Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2017 Feb 1;74(Suppl 2):S96–S103. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001238

Table 2.

Descriptive statistics for the higher and lower risk groups identified within tracts with HIV prevalence ≥ 1 percent

size Higher Risk Areas (N=12) Lower Risk Tracts (N=8) Effect

Surveillance Data Mean (S.D.) Mean (S.D.) Cohen’s d
HIV prevalence (per 100) 1.337 (0.2439) 1.292 (0.3365) 0.15
Monitored CVL 261.8 (109.0) 67.8 (37.0) 2.39
Percent out of care 42.6 (4.2) 26.8 (9.5) 2.02
Percent never in care 16.9 (5.2) 5.8 (3.2) 2.58
Per capita income (US$) 23,633 (12,222) 35,040 (24,174) 0.60
Percept below poverty level 29.7 (14.1) 28.9 (19.3) 0.05
Percent Black 88.0 (16.9) 68.3 (34.4) 0.72
Percent with education of
  B.A. or higher
21.9 (15.9) 35.7 (29.2) 0.59
Population 2,478 (642) 2,679 (993) 0.24

Note: Cohen’s d effect sizes are considered large at .8, medium at .5, and small at .2 (Cohen, 1992).