Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul-Sep;14(3):423–430. doi: 10.1590/S1679-45082016RW3088

Chart 1. Summary of articles focusing on intensivists’ knowledge of intra-abdominal pressure.

Objetives Features Results
To investigate IAP and IAH knowledge, recognition and management in Italian ICUs(24) Type: exploratory-descriptive study IAP was measured in 51 ICUs. Lack of IAP measurement was due to lack of a specific kit or unawareness of the technique. The intravesical method was the only one employed. Frequency of serial measurements: every 4 hours in the presence of risk factors (64.7%), or in emergency surgical procedures (21.5%)
Place: Italy
Sample: 77 physicians in charge of ICUs
Instrument: questionnaire comprising 9 close-ended questions
To assess knowledge of ACS, clinical application of IAP measurement, measurement methods and frequency, and criteria for decompressive laparotomy(25) Type: exploratory-descriptive study IAP was measured by 104 interviewees in suspected cases of IAH/ACS (93.9%). The intravesical method was the only one employed. Frequency: 44.2% in the presence of clinical suspicion; 26.9% every 4 to 8 hours; 15.4% every zero to 4 hours; 10.9% every 12 hours; 2.9% once every 24 hours
Place: United Kingdom
Sample: 137 physicians in charge of ICUs
Sample: 137 physicians in charge of ICUs
To assess physician's knowledge of ACS and respective management characteristics(15) Type: exploratory-descriptive study IAP was measured in patients clinically predisposed to ACS (51.4%) using the intravesical method (97%), with instillation of 60-100mL of fluid (54.3%), at 4-to-8-hour intervals (60%). Methodological issues were among the major doubts reported in questionnaires
Place: Brazil
Sample: 90 physicians working at 10 ICUs in
Rio de Janeiro
Instrument: questionnaire comprising 12 close-ended questions
To determine the current level of understanding and clinical management of IAH/ACS among intensivists working in Chinese hospitals(16) Type: exploratory-descriptive study IAP was measured by 75 physicians in suspected cases of IAH (88%); the intravesical method was used (100%) with patients in the supine position (97.3%) and using 50-100 mL of fluid (46.7%); the pubic symphysis was taken as the zero-reference point (68%). Out of 33 physicians not measuring IAP, 36.4% were not able to interpret results and 27.3% had never admitted patients suffering from IAH
Place: China
Sample: 108 physicians
Instrument: questionnaire comprising 20 close-ended questions

IAP: intra-abdominal pressure; IAH: intra-abdominal hypertension; ICU: intensive care unit; ACS: abdominal compartment syndrome.