Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jan 13.
Published in final edited form as: ACS Chem Neurosci. 2015 Feb 20;6(4):681–692. doi: 10.1021/acschemneuro.5b00020

Table 1.

Stimulation of cAMP Accumulation by D1R Agonistsa

compound EC50 (nM) Emax (% of DA)
dopamine 3.2 ± 2 100
A77636 1.6 ± 0.3 98.3 ± 8.5
dihydrexidine 1.5 ± 0.5 92.9 ± 1
apomorphine 0.45 ± 0.1 76.2 ± 8.9
SKF81297 2.0 ± 0.2 99.9 ± 2.9
chloro-APB 0.73 ± 0.1 87.9 ± 5
SKF83822 0.12 ± 0.06 73.9 ± 5.9
fenoldopam 2.8 ± 0.1 91.8 ± 3.8
SKF38393 1.1 ± 0.4 86.7 ± 9.3
SKF83959 0.2 ± 0.02 59.6 ± 11
SKF82957 0.3 ± 0.09 60.2 ± 4.5
SKF77434 1.0 ± 0.3 51.9 ± 3.8
SKF75670 0.45 ± 0.03 30 ± 3.7
a

EC50 and Emax values were obtained from nonlinear regression analysis of individual dose–response curves as shown in Figure 2. Comparison to the control maximal response exhibited by dopamine (DA) derives the percent response (Emax) of a test compound.