. 2017 Jan 13;12(1):e0168131. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168131

Table 1. Percent of variation in X explained and R² for prediction of B_⋅1 through B_⋅9 for the Tobacco data.

	% Variation of X Explained¹	R² for prediction of column:
Analysis		1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9
Unconstrained Regression	0.8	1.000	1.000	1.000	1.000	1.000	1.000	1.000	1.000	1.000
Unconstrained Decomposition	100.0	0.888	0.872	0.685	0.583	0.964	0.106	0.126	0.163	0.066
Orthogonal Regression	74.5	0.974	0.885	0.896	0.910	0.981	0.808	0.751	0.693	0.622
Orthogonal Decomposition	88.9	0.962	0.909	0.845	0.818	0.979	0.789	0.741	0.682	0.398

¹ $100 | \hat{X} |_{F}^{2} / {| X |}_{F}^{2}$

Table 1. Percent of variation in X explained and R2 for prediction of B⋅1 through B⋅9 for the Tobacco data.